Gender Bias in Quranic Interpretation: An Epistemological Analysis of the Role of Interpreters and Social Structure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64691/kx5z0m19Kata Kunci:
Gender Bias, Epistemology of Interpretation, Subject of Interpretation, Social Structure, Critical InterpretationAbstrak
Studies of Quranic interpretation have often reproduced hierarchical and androcentric interpretations of gender relations, particularly in the classical and some modern traditions, without adequate analysis of the epistemological framework, the interpreter’s subject position, and the social structures surrounding the production of meaning. This gap demonstrates the limitations of the textual-normative approach, which tends to ignore the epistemological dimension of knowledge and power relations in the interpretive process. This study aims to critically analyze the sources, mechanisms, and patterns of gender bias in Quranic interpretation by examining the relationship among the epistemology of interpretation, the interpreter’s subjectivity as an epistemic subject, and the patriarchal social structures that influence interpretive practices. This study uses a qualitative method grounded in literature reviews of representative feminist works, employing an epistemological-critical analysis to examine the assumptions underlying knowledge, scientific authority, and methodological legitimacy. The results of this study indicate that gender bias in interpretation does not originate from the Quranic text itself, but rather is a construction of knowledge shaped by androcentric epistemological assumptions, the interpreter’s historical experience and social position, and patriarchal power relations that construct interpretive authority. These findings also reveal that the choice of interpretive methods, the hierarchy of scholarly authority, and the naturalization of certain interpretive traditions all play a significant role in systematically reproducing gender bias. This study concludes that deconstructing gender bias in interpretation requires an interpretive epistemological framework that is reflective, contextual, and sensitive to gender justice as an important implication for the development of contemporary critical interpretation studies.
Referensi
Abu Zayd, N. H. (2004). Text, Authority, and Community: Essays in Quranic Hermeneutics. Leiden: Brill.
Alsaied, M. A. (2025). Interpretation of Religious Texts and Its Impact on Coexistence with Others. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1508–1528. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.944
Andok, M. (2024). The Impact of Online Media on Religious Authority. Religions, 15(9), 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091103
Arifinsyah, Dalimunthe, M. A., & Riza, F. (2025). Islamic Theological Perspectives on Human Rights: Bridging the Gap between Faith and Universal Principles. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.207
Bank, W. (2023). Women, Business and the Law 2023. Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1944-5
Calis, H. (2022). The Theoretical Foundations of Contextual Interpretation of the Qur’an in Islamic Theological Schools and Philosophical Sufism. Religions, 13(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020188
Cremer, D. J. (2021). Patriarchy, Religion, and Society. In Exploring Gender at Work (hal. 25–44). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64319-5_2
Čustović, A. (2025). Equal Before God but Not Equal Before His Law? Sharia Law and Women’s Right to Interpretation in the Light of the Human Rights Debate. Religions, 16(3), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030362
Darzi, G., Ahmadvand, A., & Nushi, M. (2021). Revealing gender discourses in the qur’ān: An integrative, dynamic and complex approach. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6228
Domen, R. E. (2016). The Ethics of Ambiguity. Academic Pathology, 3, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289516654712
Fitriyah, A., & Rahman, G. (2024). Reinterpreting Gender in the Qur’an: Realizing Inclusive Interpretation in the Modern Era. An-Nisa Jurnal Kajian Perempuan dan Keislaman, 17(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v17i2.303
Gilreath, S. (2023). Gender Inequality and Biological Supremacy: A Sex Equality Analysis of Patrick Parkinson’s “Neutral” Proposal. Journal of Law and Religion, 38(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2022.60
Ginting, L. D. C. U., Nasution, V. A., Suhendar, A., Nasution, A. R., & Ramadhan, A. R. (2023). Women in the Public Sphere: Gender Equality in Islamic Theology. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.10518
Hanafi, Y., Saefi, M., Diyana, T. N., Ikhsan, M. A., Faizin, N., Thoriquttyas, T., & Murtadho, N. (2022). Students’ perspectives on religious moderation: A qualitative study into religious literacy processes. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(1), 7638. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i1.7638
Hasan, A. (2023). Moving from Male-Centric Fallacies to Feminist Interpretive Authority. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 39(2), 91–93. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfs.2023.a908304
Hasan, H., Jahar, A. S., Umar, N., & Abdullah, I. (2022). Polygamy: Uncovering the effect of patriarchal ideology on gender-biased interpretation. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(4), a7970. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i4.7970
Ibrahim, M. (2025). The Usage of Interpretation Methodology of Ambiguous Verses in the Ancestors’s Exegesis. Islamiyyat, 47(1), 245–257. https://doi.org/10.17576/islamiyyat-2025-4701-20
Ichwan, M. N., Ming, D., & Sya’roni, M. (2025). Bridging Tradition and Modernity: Integrating Classical Interpretation and Modern Hermeneutics through Ijtihad in Qur’an Studies. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.2021
Ichwan, M. N., Ulama’i, A. H. A., Masuwd, M. A., & Abdulghani, N. A. (2024). Sufism And Quranic Interpretation: Bridging Spirituality, Culture, and Political Discourse in Muslim Societies. Ulumuna, 28(2), 655–689. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v28i2.1082
Indah, F., Choirunnisak, C., Yusman, Y., Arifin, F. M., & Ashani, S. (2025). Science, Power, and Legitimacy: The Political Role of Rulers in the Dynamics of the Development of Science in the Classical Islamic World (Abbasid–Andalusian). Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.64691/ywd7ca03
Junaidi, A., Amperawati, E. D., Dwianto, A., Putri, S. N., Rahmawati, R., & Sartono, S. (2025). The Role of Munasabah in Qur’anic Interpretation: Evolution, Practice, and Posthumanism Perspectives. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i1.920
Kusuma, S. H., Akhyar, K., Multazam, A., Imran, M., & Jamardi, S. (2026). Hadith and Women’s Voices: A Critical Analysis of Amina Wadud’s Methodology in Interpreting Gender Bias. Arba: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.64691/764cw175
Kusuma, Z., Handayani, S. A., Aslam, M., & Salleh, N. F. binti. (2025). The Intellectual Traces of Women in the Golden Age of Islam: From Science to Cosmopolitan Culture. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(4), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.64691/dx657048
Lassiter, C. (2019). Sham Epistemic Authority and Implicit Racial Bias. Social Epistemology, 33(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2018.1552995
Li, P. F. J., & Wong, Y. J. (2024). Beliefs in Free Will Versus Determinism: Search for Meaning Mediates the Life Scheme–Depressive Symptom Link. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 64(5), 940–953. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167820933719
Ma’rufi, A., Saifudin, Nisa’, K., & Muhajir. (2024). Burhani Epistemology in The Scientific Development of Contemporary Pesantren. Tafkir: Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.31538/tijie.v5i2.937
Mahmoud, M. M. A. (2025). Gender Dynamics in Qur’anic Translation: Analyzing Male and Female Perspectives on Surat Al-Fatiha. Traduction et Langues, 24(1), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.52919/translang.v24i01.1032
Masama, A. A., & Abubakar, A. B. (2025). Prerequisites before Interpretation: A Scholarly Examination of Qur’anic Exegetical Qualifications. Middle East Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture, 5(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.36348/mejisc.2025.v05i01.007
Maulana, A. I., Arifinsyah, A., & Husein, M. (2023). Naẓariyyah al-Ma’rifah fī at-Tafsīr al-’Ilmi li al-Qurān al-Karīm. ZAD Al-Mufassirin, 5(1), 144–165. https://doi.org/10.55759/zam.v5i1.69
Motamayel, M. A., Ehteshami, A. H., & Hoseini, S. H. (2024). Analysis of Life Events Based on Divine Will and Human Free Will from the Perspective of the Holy Qur’an. Islamic Knowledge and Insight, 2(1), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.61838/iki.2.1.17
Mukminin, A., Hanun, A., Zainuddin, Mushtofa, L., & Wassalwa, A. (2025). Integration of Bayani, Burhani and Irfani Epistemologies in Arabic Language Learning in Islamic Boarding School-Based Colleges. Asalibuna, 9(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.30762/asalibuna.v9i01.5292
Nasohah, Z. (2024). Dynamics of Islamic Family Law in Facing Current Challenges in Southeast Asia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 8(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.16553
Nikmatullah, N. (2024). Male Ulama Reinterpretation of the Gender Hadith in Indonesian Socio Cultural Contexts. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.213
Programme, U. N. D. (2024). Human Development Report 2023/2024: Breaking the Gridlock—Reimagining Cooperation in a Polarized World. New York. Retrieved from https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2023-24
Rahman, F. (1980). Major Themes of the Qur’an. Chicago: Bibliotheca Islamica.
Saeed, A., & Akbar, A. (2021). Contextualist Approaches and the Interpretation of the Qur’ān. Religions, 12(7), 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070527
Supena, I. (2024). Epistemology of Tafsīr, Ta’wīl, and Hermeneutics: Towards an Integrative Approach. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.141.08
Surya, I., Imran, M., . D., . R., Mariadi, A. M., & Ramadhani, I. A. (2025). Defending Women’s Right to Leadership in Islam: The Reconstruction of Mainstream Gender-Biased Qur’anic Exegesis of Leadership Verse. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(6), 3663–3675. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2501
Tafkir, M., Hidayat, Z., & Ayob, M. A. bin. (2026). Deconstructing Patriarchy in Islam: An Analysis of Asma Barlas’ Unreading Concept of the Patriarchal Interpretation of the Quran. Arba: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.64691/tqrng369
Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and Woman: Rereading a Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wadud, A. (2021). Reflections on Islamic Feminist Exegesis of the Qur’an. Religions, 12(7), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070497
Yang, Y. (2020). What’s Hegemonic about Hegemonic Masculinity? Legitimation and Beyond. Sociological Theory, 38(4), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275120960792
Yuliharti, Y., Agustiar, A., Hasbi, R., Efendi, A., & Alfiah, A. (2025). Reconstruction of Gender Interpretation in Misogynistic Hadiths: Implications for Islamic Education Reform. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1654–1666. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.964
Zekkour, H., & Imamuddin, I. (2024). Methods of Understanding the Quran and Hadith from Ancient Times to Modern Times. Journal of Education and Teacher Training Innovation, 2(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.61227/jetti.v2i2.112
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Pandy Pratama, Ranjan Owen, Samia Woodring, Emilie Abraham, Emily Gupta
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
