Deconstructing Patriarchy in Islam: An Analysis of Asma Barlas’ Unreading Concept of the Patriarchal Interpretation of the Quran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64691/tqrng369Keywords:
Patriarchal Interpretation; Asma Barlas; Unreading; Deconstruction; Gender EqualityAbstract
The dominance of patriarchal interpretation in the treasury of Quranic interpretation has historically shaped hierarchical gender relations and has had direct implications for the legitimacy of social inequality between men and women. Although studies on Islamic feminism and Asma Barlas’s thoughts have developed, most research remains descriptive. It has not yet positioned the concept of unreading as a systematic epistemological critique of the objectivity claims of patriarchal interpretation. This article critically analyzes Asma Barlas’s concept of unreading as a strategy for deconstructing patriarchal interpretations. It evaluates its implications for the renewal of a gender-just methodology in the interpretation of the Quran. This research employs a qualitative method based on literature studies, utilizing a critical hermeneutic approach and epistemological discourse analysis. It involves an in-depth review of Asma Barlas’s primary works and a comparative analysis of classical and modern interpretations of key verses related to gender relations. The results of the study indicate that patriarchy in interpretation is built through three main patterns: first, a literalistic reading that affirms male superiority and removes the ethical context of the Quran; second, the limitation of women’s roles in the public sphere through the naturalization of biological differences into normative hierarchies; and third, the reproduction of masculine religious authority that forecloses the possibility of a plurality of meanings. Barlas’s concept of unreading serves as an epistemological critique that rejects the neutrality of such interpretations by affirming monotheism, justice, and equality as the normative hermeneutic principles of the Quran. In conclusion, the unreading approach not only destabilizes the hegemony of patriarchal interpretations but also provides an alternative methodological framework that significantly contributes to the development of a more egalitarian and inclusive Quranic interpretation in contemporary Islamic studies.
References
Abdellatif, A., & Haynes, K. (2025). Be-ing seen: towards a feminist interpretative phenomenological analysis to researching the marginalised. Culture and Organization, 31(1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2024.2378789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2024.2378789
Al-Jaṣṣāṣ, A. B. A. ibn ‘Alī al-R. (1992). Aḥkām Al-Qurʻān. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arābī.
Al-Qurṭubī, A. ‘Abd Allāh M. ibn A. al-A. (1964). al-Jāmi’ li Aḥkām al-Qur’ān. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.
Al-Sharmani, M. (2018). Marriage in Islamic Interpretive Tradition: Revisiting the Legal and the Ethical. Journal of Islamic Ethics, 2(1–2), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-12340017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-12340017
Al-Sharmani, M. (2023). Islamic Feminist Hermeneutics: Between Scholarship and Lived Realities. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 39(2), 95–97. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfs.2023.a908305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/jfs.2023.a908305
Al-Ṭabarī, A. J. M. ibn J. (2001). Jāmi’ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl al-Qur’ān. Cairo: Dār al-Hijr.
Ali, K. (2016a). On Critique and Careful Reading. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 32(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.32.2.19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.32.2.19
Ali, K. (2016b). Sexual Ethics and Islam: Feminist Reflections on Quran, Hadith and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
Arabi, I., & Mujahid, A. (2024). The Construction of Guru Bakhiet’s Gender Interpretation: Between Subordination and Women’s Empowerment. Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision, 4(3), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v4i3.480 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v4i3.480
Arkoun, M. (2019). Rethinking Islam. Milton Park: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429304651
Bakhshizadeh, M. (2023). A Social Psychological Critique on Islamic Feminism. Religions, 14(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020202
Barlas, A. (2001). The Qur’an and Hermeneutics: Reading the Qur’an’s Opposition to Patriarchy. Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 3(2), 15–38. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2001.3.2.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2001.3.2.15
Barlas, A. (2012). “Believing Women” in Islam: Unreading Patriarchal Interpretations of the Qur’an. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Čustović, A. (2025). Equal Before God but Not Equal Before His Law? Sharia Law and Women’s Right to Interpretation in the Light of the Human Rights Debate. Religions, 16(3), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030362 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030362
Darzi, G., Ahmadvand, A., & Nushi, M. (2021). Revealing gender discourses in the qur’ān: An integrative, dynamic and complex approach. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 77(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v77i4.6228
El-Ali, L. (2022). Women Were Not Created of Inferior Celestial Material. In L. El-Ali (Ed.), No Truth Without Beauty: God, the Qur’an, and Women’s Rights (pp. 45–62). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83582-8_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83582-8_5
Fitryansyah, M. A. (2024). Understanding Gender Justice: Asma Barlas Perspective on Women and the Qur’an. Martabat: Jurnal Perempuan Dan Anak, 8(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.21274/martabat.2024.8.1.107-122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21274/martabat.2024.8.1.107-122
Gadamer, H.-G. (1977). Truth and Method. London: Sheed and Ward.
Harahap, A. P., Is, F., & Julaiha P, J. (2025). Examining Ḥadīth on Women as a Source of Fitna: Thematic and Contextual Approaches. Australian Journal of Islamic Studies, 10(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v10i2.745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v10i2.745
Hasan, A. (2023). Moving from Male-Centric Fallacies to Feminist Interpretive Authority. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion, 39(2), 91–93. https://doi.org/10.2979/jfs.2023.a908304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/jfs.2023.a908304
Hasan, H., Jahar, A. S., Umar, N., & Abdullah, I. (2022). Polygamy: Uncovering the effect of patriarchal ideology on gender-biased interpretation. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 78(4), a7970. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i4.7970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i4.7970
Ichwan, M. N., Ming, D., & Sya’roni, M. (2025). Bridging Tradition and Modernity: Integrating Classical Interpretation and Modern Hermeneutics through Ijtihad in Qur’an Studies. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.2021
Ismail, N., Firdaus, M., & Darmawijaya, E. (2024). Gender equality in the Qur’an: An Analysis of surah an-Nisa’ verses 1 and 34 in the exegesis of al-Tabari and al-Rāzī. Gender Equality International Journal of Child and Gender Studies, 10(2), 224. https://doi.org/10.22373/equality.v10i2.25932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/equality.v10i2.25932
Kaṡīr, A. al-F. I. bin ‘Umar bin. (2004). Tafsīr Al-Quran al-‘Aẓīm (A. Ghoffar & A. I. Al-Atsari, eds.). Bogor: Pustaka Imam asy-Syafi’i.
Khairuddin, K., Perdamaian, P., Suhaimi, S., & Abidin, Z. (2024). Gender Insight in the Process of Human Creation Al-Quran Perspective. Al-Risalah, 15(1), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.34005/alrisalah.v15i1.3543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34005/alrisalah.v15i1.3543
Musawah. (2020). Home Truths: A Global Report on Equality in the Muslim Family. Selangor. Retrieved from https://www.musawah.org/resources/home-truths-a-global-report-on-equality-in-the-muslim-family/
Nations, U. (2023). Gender Justice and the Law: country reports 2022.
Nawafil, M., & Suparwany. (2021). Revitalization of Theoretical Response Study of Ignaz Goldziher and Joseph Schacht Hadith Criticism. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 4(2), 116–140. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v4i2.3385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v4i2.3385
Nugroho, R. S., Asy’arie, M., Chusniatun, C., Waston, W., Muthoifin, M., AN, A. N., & Elbanna, M. (2024). Household Justice Management in Views of Polygamy Practitioners: A Key Principle for Familial Stability and Harmony in Islamic Education. Journal of Management World, 2024(4), 840–847. https://doi.org/10.53935/jomw.v2024i4.546 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53935/jomw.v2024i4.546
Quṭb, S. (2004). Fī Ẓilāl Al-Qur’ān. Jakarta: Gema Insani.
Rahman, F. (1980). Major Themes of the Qur’an. Chicago: Bibliotheca Islamica.
Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and Modernity: Transformation of an Intellectual Tradition. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
Resky, M. (2024). Holistic Hermeneutics of Qur’anic Verses: Reinterpreting for Achieving Gender Equality in Contemporary Islamic Society. Aqwal: Journal of Qur’an and Hadis Studies, 5(2), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.28918/aqwal.v5i2.7365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28918/aqwal.v5i2.7365
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Siregar, I., & Harahap, A. P. (2024). Kontekstualisasi Hadis tentang Kurangnya Kecerdasan Perempuan dan Agama [Contextualization of the Hadith on the Lack of Women’s Intelligence and Religion]. Tajdid: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 23(1), 218–257. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v23i1.442 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v23i1.442
Umami, A. I. (2021). The Meaning of Men’s Degrees are Higher Over Women (Application of Roland Barthes Semiotics Against QS Al-Baqarah [2]:228). Taqaddumi: Journal of Quran and Hadith Studies, 1(2), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.12928/taqaddumi.v1i2.4822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/taqaddumi.v1i2.4822
Wadud, A. (1999). Qur’an and Woman: Rereading a Sacred Text from a Woman’s Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wadud, A. (2006). Inside the Gender Jihad: Women’s Reform in Islam. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Tafkir, Zumardin Hidayat, Mohd Anas bin Ayob

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












