The Mustaḍʿafīn in the Qur’an as Epistemic Subjects: The Shift of Knowledge Authority from the Elite to Marginalized Groups

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64691/y4dkjh28

Keywords:

Mustaḍʿafīn, Epistemic Subject, Epistemic Authority, Social Epistemology, Epistemic Credibility

Abstract

The position of the mustaḍʿafīn (the oppressed/marginalized) in the Qur’an raises an epistemological question about how credibility and epistemic authority are distributed in relations between subordinate groups and elites. Studies of the mustaḍʿafīn have largely framed them in terms of social, political, and religious injustice; consequently, they have not systematically mapped their roles as actors who know, bear witness, recognize truth, and articulate their experiences. This research aims to identify the mustaḍʿafīn’s epistemic agency, map the mechanisms that legitimize and delegitimize knowledge claims in their interactions with elites, and formulate the implications for the Qur’an’s social epistemology. This library-based study employs thematic exegesis (tafsīr mawḍūʿī) with social epistemology as its conceptual framework, utilizing semantic, intratextual, and narrative analyses as analytical tools. The corpus comprises verses containing the linguistic root ḍ-ʿ-f and narratives involving subordinate groups that feature acts of knowing, bearing witness, recognizing truth, making knowledge claims, and elite responses; the study uses both classical and contemporary interpretations to verify the consistency of the readings. The findings reveal three primary patterns. First, the mustaḍʿafīn emerge as epistemic subjects through experience, testimony, collective memory, the recognition of guidance, and the articulation of objections to elite claims. Second, elite authority is constructed through status, power, honor, wealth, and traditional authority—factors that shape credibility before assessing a claim’s validity. In contrast, the legitimacy of the mustaḍʿafīn is determined by their capacity to know, the consistency of their testimony, their receptivity to guidance, and the integrity of their actions. Third, a marginal position provides an epistemic perspective that broadens social knowledge, though it does not guarantee truth. In conclusion, the Qur’an corrects the distribution of credibility. It shifts the basis of legitimacy from social status to epistemic grounds, without transferring the authority of truth from the elite to the mustaḍʿafīn.

References

Akmaliah, W. (2024). Islam Transformatif: Conceptualizing Liberation Theology for Indonesian Muslim Society. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam, 14(1), 188–210. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2024.14.1.188-210

Al-Bayḍāwī, N. al-D. A. S. ʿAbd A. ibn ʿUmar ibn M. al-S. (1997). Anwār al-Tanzīl wa al-Asrār wa al-Ta’wīl. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-ʿArābī.

Al-Qurṭubī, A. ʿAbd A. M. ibn A. al-A. (1999). al-Jāmiʿ li-Aḥkām Al-Qur’ān. Cairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.

Al-Rāzī, A. ʿAbd A. M. ibn ʿAmr ibn al-Ḥasan ibn al-Ḥusayn al-T. (2001). Mafātiḥ al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-ʿArābī.

Al-Ṭabarī, A. J. M. ibn J. (2001). Jāmiʿ al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥijr.

Alwi, M., Rusdi, M., Abubakar, A., & Ilham, M. (2022). Al-Mustadh’afin: Reflection of the Qur’an on Social Inequalities. FITRAH: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 8(2), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v8i2.5633

Aswar, H., & Afifi, S. (2024). An Analytical Study of the Da’wah Movement of Prophet Muhammad in Relation to Social Movement Theory. Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 14(2), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.142.12

Bacevic, J. (2023). Epistemic injustice and epistemic positioning: towards an intersectional political economy. Current Sociology, 71(6), 1122–1140. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211057609

Belhaj, A. (2025). Injustice in Contemporary Islamic Theology: Explanation, Punishment and the Hereafter. Religions, 16(10), 1304. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16101304

Bristol, R., & Rossano, F. (2020). Epistemic trespassing and disagreement. Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104067

Bruggisser, S., Hervais‐Adelman, A., & Roswandowitz, C. (2026). Social voice judgement is dyadic: Acoustic typicality and interpersonal similarity interact. British Journal of Psychology, 70089. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70089

Drummond, G., & Tipton, M. J. (2024). How to spot the truth. Experimental Physiology, 109(11), 1811–1814. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092160

Falbo, A. (2022). Hermeneutical Injustice: Distortion and Conceptual Aptness. Hypatia, 37(2), 343–363. https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2022.4

Firestone, R. (2024). The Prophet Problem. Religions, 15(11), 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111406

Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haecal, F., & Irfan, M. (2025). Analysis of The Concept of Mustadhafin In Surah al-Nisa Verse 75: A Hermeneutical Study of Farid Esak. Senarai: Journal of Islamic Heritage and Civilization, 1(1), 1–08. https://doi.org/10.66236/senarai.2024.1.1.01-08

Hameleers, M., & Meer, T. van der. (2025). The Implications of Epistemic Polarization and Factual Relativism for Misinformation Research and Democracy. Political Communication, 42(5), 917–923. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2025.2514595

Hurnawijaya, Auladi, A., Fitriana, N., Khaqiqi, A. F., Mutiara M, Ningrum, U., … Arsyad, ⁠Najwah. (2025). Dialectical engagement with biblical narratives in Ibn ‘Ashur’s Tafsīr Al-Taḥrīr wa Al-Tanwīr: Study of Aaron, Jesus, and Noah’s Wife narratives. Research Journal in Advanced Humanities, 6(3), 2132. https://doi.org/10.58256/84c1wd64

ʿĀshūr, M. al-Ṭāhir I. (1985). al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Tunis: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah.

Ibn Kathīr, A. al-F. I. ibn ʿUmar. (2004). Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān al-ʿAẓīm. Riyadh: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī.

Joule, V. (2022). Worlds of knowledge in women’s travel writing. Women’s History Review, 31(6), 1070–1072. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2022.2083370

Kojonen, E. V. R. (2025). On Literary Miracles and Social Credibility: The Epistemology of an Islamic Argument. Religions, 16(10), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16101319

Kunst, J. R., Fischer, R., Sidanius, J., & Thomsen, L. (2017). Preferences for group dominance track and mediate the effects of macro-level social inequality and violence across societies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 5407–5412. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616572114

Levy, N., & Alfano, M. (2020). Knowledge From Vice: Deeply Social Epistemology. Mind, 129(515), 887–915. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz017

Lynch, T. (2020). Epistemic injustice and the veil: Islam, vulnerability, and the task of historical revisionism. Culture and Religion, 21(3), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2022.2115524

McKinnon, R. (2016). Epistemic Injustice. Philosophy Compass, 11(8), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12336

Mujahidin, A., Itmam, M. S., & Rofiq, A. C. (2024). The Dynamic of Contextualization in Indonesian Qur’anic Tafsirs: A Comparative Study of Tafsir Al-Azhar and Tafsir Al-Mishbāh on The Story of The Prophet Moses. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 25(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v25i2.5397

Nasution, H., Shihab, S. A., Al-Hawary, S. I. S., Pallathadka, H., Al-Salami, A. A. A., Van, L., … Muda, I. (2023). Values, accountability and trust among Muslim staff in Islamic organisations. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1), 8272. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8272

Pratama, P., Owen, R., Woodring, S., Abraham, E., & Gupta, E. (2026). Gender Bias in Quranic Interpretation: An Epistemological Analysis of the Role of Interpreters and Social Structure. Arba: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2(2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.64691/kx5z0m19

Quṭb, S. (2004). Tafsīr Fī Ẓilāl Al-Qur’ān. Jakarta: Gema Insani.

Rashid, I. (2026). The Muslim Aporia?: A Community’s Quest for Rights in Kashmir. Global Intellectual History, 11(2), 118–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/23801883.2025.2478098

Schweiger, G., & Souza, L. G. D. C. De. (2026). Editorial: Recognition and critical social research. Frontiers in Sociology, 11, 1924183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2026.1924183

Shihab, M. Q. (2010). Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Uy, C. V. (2026). Being and Time: Prophetic Cycles and Political Revolution in Ibn Qasī’s (d. 546/1151) Doffing Sandals. Journal of Sufi Studies, 15(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/22105956-bja10045

Willmott, H. (2015). Why Institutional Theory Cannot Be Critical. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492614545306

Zulfahmi, Ginting, L. D. C. U., & Desky, A. F. (2024). Looking at Islam’s Struggle for the Liberation of the Ummah: The Perspective of Bilal Bin Rabbah’s Liberation Theology. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(5), 522. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.522

Downloads

Published

2026-10-26

How to Cite

Syahputra, H., Drajat, A., Adri, S., & Qashqary, A. M. (2026). The Mustaḍʿafīn in the Qur’an as Epistemic Subjects: The Shift of Knowledge Authority from the Elite to Marginalized Groups. Arba: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2(4), 418-437. https://doi.org/10.64691/y4dkjh28