Kebebasan Beragama dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Studi Komparatif Ajaran Islam, Kristen, dan Hindu

Authors

  • Maryam Rasyid Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Kupang Author
  • Ahmad Malikai Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Kupang Author
  • Alexsander Bani Institut Agama Kristen Negeri Kupang Author
  • I Gede Febriyasa Institut Agama Hindu Negeri Gde Pudja Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64691/qgwaah90

Keywords:

Freedom of Religion; Human Rights; Islam; Christianity; Hinduism

Abstract

Freedom of religion is a central issue in human rights discourse, yet it still faces serious challenges in the form of increasing intolerance and belief-based violence. Although the literature on each religious tradition is quite extensive, a notable lack remains in studies that systematically compare the theological foundations and normative implications of Islamic, Christian, and Hindu teachings with modern standards of religious freedom, thereby creating a conceptual gap in the study of religion and human rights. This study aims to describe the key doctrines of the three traditions regarding freedom of belief, compare the normative principles governing the relationship between individual freedom and religious authority, and identify conceptual points of convergence and differences in relation to universal human rights principles. The method used is a qualitative-comparative study with hermeneutic textual analysis of primary sources, namely the Quran, the Bible, and the Vedas, based on thematic relevance, as well as a review of purposively selected secondary academic literature. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach to map conceptual patterns across traditions. The results of the study reveal four main themes: first, the theological basis of freedom of belief; second, the moral and social limits of individual freedom; third, the position of religious authority; and fourth, the relationship between tolerance and pluralism. Islam emphasizes freedom oriented toward moral responsibility and social justice; Christianity emphasizes freedom of conscience based on the dignity of the imago Dei. In contrast, Hinduism emphasizes spiritual plurality as a space for seeking truth. All three demonstrate a consensus on human dignity and the rejection of coercion. The focus of the textual analysis limits the conclusions; empirical studies are needed to test their implementation in social practice and public policy.

References

Al-Māwardī. (1989). al-Aḥkām al-Sultāniyyah. Kuwayt: Maktabah Dār Ibn Qutaybah.

Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (2010). Fiqh al-Wasaṭiyyah al-Islāmiyyah wa al-Tajdīd. Kairo: Maktabah Wahbah.

Al-Rāzī, A. ‘Abdillah M. bin ‘Amr bin al-Ḥasan bin al-Ḥusain al-T. (2001). Mafātiḥ al-Gaib. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāṡ al-Arābī.

Al-Sarrāj, A. N. ʻAbdullah bin ʻAlī. (2007). al-Lumaʻ al-Taṣawwuf. Mesir: Dār al-Kutub al-Ḥadīṡ.

Al-Ṭabarī, A. J. M. bin J. (2001). Jāmi’ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl ai Al-Qur’ān. Kairo: Dār al-Ḥijr.

Al-Żahabī, S. M. bin A. bin ‘Uṡmān. (1985). Siyar A’lām al-Nubalā’. Kairo: Dār al-Ḥadīṡ.

Albertsen, D., & de Soysa, I. (2018). Oil, Islam, and the Middle East: An Empirical Analysis of the Repression of Religion, 1980–2013. Politics and Religion, 11(2), 249–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048317000736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048317000736

Arifinsyah, Dalimunthe, M. A., & Riza, F. (2025). Islamic Theological Perspectives on Human Rights: Bridging the Gap between Faith and Universal Principles. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.207

Barth, K. (1960). The Humanity of God. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.

Basham, A. L. (1954). The Wonder That Was India. London: Sidgwick & Jackson.

Bonhoeffer, D. (1959). The Cost of Discipleship. New York: Touchstone.

Brereton, J. P., & Jamison, S. W. (2014). The Rigveda: A Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chino, T. J. (2023). Liberating God: Human Freedom in Barth and Cone. Black Theology, 21(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2023.2223082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2023.2223082

Clark, W. R. (2022). Ethics and the Future of Religion: Redefining the Absolute (1st ed.). Lanham: Lexington Books. https://doi.org/10.5771/9781978708655 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9781978708655

Cortez, M. (2010). Theological Anthropology: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: T&T Clark.

Danca, M.-I. (2023). From Inter-Religious Dialogue to Intra-Religious Dialogue: An Original Perspective of André Scrima’s Thought. Religion, 14(6), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14060756 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14060756

Duquette, J. (2016). Tradition, Identity and Scriptural Authority: Religious Inclusivism in the Writings of an Early Modern Sanskrit Intellectual. Religions of South Asia, 9(3), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.v9i3.28338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/rosa.v9i3.28338

Evans, M. (2020). Why Religious Freedom matters for Democracy: Comparative Reflections from Britain and France for a Democratic ‘vivre ensemble’. Myriam Hunter-Henin. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 9(2), 409–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojlr/rwaa030

Gandhi, M. (1940). Non-Violence in Peace and War. Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House.

Gardner, P. X. (2023). Religious & Irreligious Freedom in Catholic Magisterial Teaching. Religion, 14(5), 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14050671 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14050671

Harshavardhana, N. S., & Srinivas, K. S. (2022). A Short Synopsis of Srimad Bhagavad Gita in Selected Ten Verses. Dev Sanskriti Interdisciplinary International Journal, 19, 38–43. https://doi.org/10.36018/dsiij.v19i.216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36018/dsiij.v19i.216

Herner, R. W. (2021). Islam and Institutional Religious Freedom in Indonesia. Religion, 12(6), 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060415

Hick, J. (1989). An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent. New Haven: Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230371286

Hisyām, ‘Abdurraḥman bin ‘Abdullah bin Aḥmad bin Abū al-Ḥasan al-Khaṡ’amī al-Suhailī ‘Abdul Malik bin. (2007). al-Sīrah al-Nabawiyyah li Ibni Hisyām. Mesir: Dār al-Ṣaḥābah.

Howard, V. R. (2023). The Nonviolence Conundrum: Political Peace and Personal Karma in Jain and Hindu Traditions. Religion, 14(2), 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14020178

ʻĀsyūr, M. al-Ṭāhir I. (1985). al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Tunisia: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah.

Karimullah, S. S. (2023). The Implications of Islamic Law on the Rights of Religious Minorities in Muslim-Majority Countries. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 2(2), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v2i2.7847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v2i2.7847

Kilner, J. F. (2015). Dignity and Destiny: Humanity in the Image of God. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Knitter, P. (2012). Challenges of Interreligious and Intercultural Cooperation Today. Political Theology, 13(4), 397–399. https://doi.org/10.1558/poth.v13i4.397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/poth.v13i4.397

Küng, H. (1991). Global Responsibility: In Search of a New World Ethic. Spring Valley: Crossroad Publishing Company.

Lieberman, P. (2016). Augustine: On the Free Choice of the Will, On Grace and Free Choice, and Other Writings. The European Legacy, 21(1), 106–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2015.1097072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2015.1097072

Long, J. D. (2019). Anubhava in the Tradition of Sri Ramakrishna. Religion, 10(3), 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10030210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10030210

Macek, P. (2025). Trinitarian Ontology of Freedom: David C. Schindler’s Philosophy and Theology of Freedom and Its Political Implications. Religion, 16(7), 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070858 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070858

Majumdar, S., & Crawford, S. (2024). Globally, Government Restrictions on Religion Reached Peak Levels in 2021, While Social Hostilities Went Down. Washington.

Marsden, L. (2020). International Religious Freedom Promotion and US Foreign Policy. Religion, 11(5), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11050260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11050260

Matilal, B. K. (2002). The Character of Logic in India. New York: SUNY Press.

Middleton, J. R. (2005). The Liberating Image: The Imago Dei in Genesis 1. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press.

Naeem, F. S. (2025). Monotheistic Hindus, Idolatrous Muslims: Muḥammad Qāsim Nānautvī, Dayānanda Sarasvatī, and the Theological Roots of Hindu–Muslim Conflict in South Asia. Religion, 16(3), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020256

Nicholson, A. J. (2010). Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/nich14986

Nutt, R. W., & Salvo, M. R. De. (2021). The Debate Over Dignitatis Humanae at Vatican II: The Contribution of Charles Cardinal Journet. The Thomist: A Speculative Quarterly Review, 85(2), 175–226. https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2021.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.2021.0012

Oviedo, L. (2025). Public Theology as Practicing Theology from Below: Looking for the Right Sense of the ‘Human’ in Human Rights. Religion, 16(3), 370. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030370

Panikkar, R. (1977). The Vedic Experience: Mantramañjarī: an Anthology of the Vedas for Modern Man and Contemporary Celebration. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Pavithran, H., & Sivakami, B. (2025). Reimagining Spiritual Horizons: Critical Reflections on Reinventing Sanatana Dharma. Space and Culture, India, Vol. 12, pp. 84–89. https://doi.org/10.20896/adctbq85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20896/adctbq85

Pranatha, I. P. E. (2024). Perbandingan Advaita Vedanta, Dvaita, dan Vishishtadvaita dalam Pendidikan Filsafat Agama Hindu. Global Education Journal, 2(3), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.v2i3.145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59525/gej.v2i3.145

Prianto, A. L. (2024). Hijacking of State Power on Religious Freedom by Community Organizations in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Isl, 24(2), 348–367. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v24i2.17916 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v24i2.17916

Rambachan, A. (2015). A Hindu Theology of Liberation: Not-Two Is Not One. Albany: SUNY Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438454573

Ridha, M. R., & Abduh, M. (2008). Tafsīr al-Manār. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Rigopoulos, A. (2019). Tolerance in Swami Vivekānanda’s Neo-Hinduism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 45(4), 438–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719828425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719828425

Rozak, A., & Anwar, R. (2016). Ilmu Kalam. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia.

Saeed, A. (2006). Interpreting the Qur’an: Towards a Contemporary Approach. London: Routledge.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Shah, T. S. (2021). India’s Other Religious Freedom Problems. Religion, 12(7), 490. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070490

Sharma, A. (2000). Classical Hindu Thought: An Introduction. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195658712.001.0001

Tillich, P. (1952). The Courage to Be. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Verovšek, P. J. (2020). Habermas’s Politics of Rational Freedom: Navigating the History of Philosophy between Faith and Knowledge. Analyse & Kritik, 42(1), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2020-0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2020-0008

Vivekananda, S. (2018). Jnana-Yoga: The Path of Knowledge. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Wiedersheim, K. A. (2022). Dietrich Bonhoeffer: Ideology, Praxis and his Influence on the Theology of Liberation. Political Theology, 23(8), 721–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1925438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1925438

Downloads

Published

2025-12-23

How to Cite

Rasyid, M., Malikai , A. ., Bani , A., & Febriyasa, I. G. . (2025). Kebebasan Beragama dan Hak Asasi Manusia: Studi Komparatif Ajaran Islam, Kristen, dan Hindu. Kamali: Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 1(2), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.64691/qgwaah90