Konsep Ketuhanan dalam Filsafat Ibn ʻArabī dan Meister Eckhart: Dialektika antara Transendensi dan Immanensi

Authors

  • Marlichasia Marlichasia Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Theologia Jaffray Author
  • Ferdinand Saputra Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Theologia Jaffray Author
  • Afdol Salam Universitas Islam Makassar Author
  • Jubaidah Fatmawati Universitas Islam Makassar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64691/kamali.v1i1.80

Keywords:

Ibn ʻArabī ; Meister Eckhart; Transcendence; Immanence; Waḥdah Al-Wujūd

Abstract

Understanding the concept of God in two major traditions—Islam and Christianity—has profound philosophical and theological significance, especially when examined through the mystical thought of Ibn ʻArabī and Meister Eckhart, who both position God as the highest reality in the dialectic between transcendence and immanence. This study aims to analyze and compare the metaphysical, epistemological, and anthropological structures of the concept of God in these two figures to reveal patterns of unity and difference in how they interpret the relationship between God, the world, and humans. Using a qualitative approach and a philosophical-comparative hermeneutic method, this study explores primary texts such as Ibn ʻArabī ’s Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam and al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyyah, as well as Meister Eckhart’s sermons and tracts, accompanied by an analysis of relevant secondary literature. The results of the study show that metaphysically, Ibn ʻArabī affirms Absolute Wuju d as a single reality that manifests itself through tajallī in all forms of existence, while Eckhart understands Godhead as the “Divine foundation” that transcends all categories but simultaneously gives birth to the world through a dynamic emanative process. In the epistemological realm, Ibn ʻArabī views knowledge of God as realized through direct experience (kashf) of Divine manifestations, while Eckhart emphasizes the “birth of the Word” in the soul as a process of inner union with God. Anthropologically, both see humans as microcosms and mirrors of the Divine in which God reflects Himself. This study concludes that the thoughts of Ibn ʻArabī and Meister Eckhart demonstrate a dialectical structure of the Divine, where transcendence and immanence are harmoniously combined in a single and inseparable metaphysical reality.

Author Biographies

  • Marlichasia Marlichasia, Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Theologia Jaffray

    Mahasiswa Program Sarjana (S1) Ilmu Filsafat

  • Ferdinand Saputra, Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Theologia Jaffray

    Mahasiswa Program Sarjana (S1) Ilmu Filsafat

  • Afdol Salam, Universitas Islam Makassar

    Mahasiswa Program Sarjana (S1) Pendidikan Agama Islam

  • Jubaidah Fatmawati, Universitas Islam Makassar

    Mahasiswa Program Sarjana (S1) Pendidikan Agama Islam

References

’Arabī, M. al-D. I. (1980). Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam (A. al-‘Alā ’Afīfī, ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-’Arabī.

Ahmad, I. (2025). Reinterpretasi Epistemologi Pendidikan Islam dalam Filsafat Al-Fārābī sebagai Solusi Krisis Makna Kurikulum Kontemporer. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.50

Caputo, J. D. (1978). The Mystical Element in Heidegger’s Thought. New York: Fordham University Press.

Chittick, W. C. (1989). The Sufi Path of Knowledge: Ibn al-ʻArabī’s Metaphysics of Imagination. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Chittick, W. C. (1994). Imaginal Worlds: Ibn al-’Arabī and the Problem of Religious Diversity. Albany: SUNY Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780791498958

Corbin, H. (1969). Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn ’Arabī. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Davies, O. (1991). Meister Eckhart: Mystical Theologian. London: SPCK.

Eckhart, M. (1981a). Selected Writings. London: Penguin Classics.

Eckhart, M. (1981b). Sermons and Treatises. London: Watkins.

Eckhart, M. (1981c). The Essential Sermons, Commentaries, Treatises, and Defense. New York: Paulist Press.

Eckhart, M. (2009). The Complete Mystical Works. New York: Crossroad.

Ezeani, C. C., & Nweke, C. C. (2024). Real Relations and Contingency in God: a Critique of the Basic Statements of Whitehead’S Dipolar Theism. Philosophia (Philippines), 25(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.46992/pijp.25.1.a.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46992/pijp.25.1.a.7

Fadillah, R., & Purba, K. A. (2025). Humanisasi Pendidikan Islam Melalui Konseling Qur’ani: Menjawab Tantangan Individualisme dan Materialisme Global. Arba: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 1(3), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.64691/arba.v1i3.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64691/arba.v1i3.17

ʻArabī, M. al-D. I. (2011). al-Futūḥāt al-Makkiyyah. Beirut: Dār al-Maʻrifah.

Kakaie, G. (2007). The extroversive unity of existence from Ibn ‘Arabi’s and Meister Eckhart’s viewpoints. Topoi, 26(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-007-9019-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-007-9019-7

Kassa, A. (2024). Paul’s Reconciliation Theology, and the New Cosmology. Religion, 15, 202. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15020202 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15020202

Katzaroff, G. N. (2024). Dao, the Godhead, and the Wandering Way: Daoism and Eckhart’s Mystical Theology. Religions, 15(9), 1098. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091098

Lesmana, S. (2025). Rekontekstualisasi Filsafat Islam dalam Kurikulum Madrasah untuk Penguatan Nalar Kritis dan Pembentukan Insan Kamil. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(3), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.53

McGinn, B. (2001). The Mystical Thought of Meister Eckhart: The Man from Whom God Hid Nothing. New York: Crossroad.

Mirzarakhimov, B. (2025). The Essence of the Concept of Wahdat Al-Wujud in Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi’s Sufism: An Analysis Based on the “Risalat Al-Wujudiyya.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 15(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.151.06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.151.06

Purba, R. (2025). Kritik Hermeneutik Filsafat Islam atas Dominasi Positivisme dalam Pendidikan Madrasah di Indonesia. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.51

Rabeya, T. (2024). Mystical Thoughts of Tagore and Iqbal: A Comparative Analysis. Philosophy and Progress, 73(1–2), 183–214. https://doi.org/10.3329/pp.v73i1-2.75232 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/pp.v73i1-2.75232

Ramadhan, A. N. F. (2024). Hermeneutics of Gender: A Comparative Study of Hermeneutical Models Amina Wadud and Farid Esack. Bulletin of Islamic Research, 2(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.69526/bir.v2i2.10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69526/bir.v2i2.10

Suswita, S. (2025). Antara Taklid dan Ijtihad: Dialektika Pembentukan Nalar Kritis Siswa dalam Pendidikan Islam. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(3), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.52 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.52

Turner, D. (1995). The Darkness of God: Negativity in Christian Mysticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583131

Woods OP, R. (2013). Mystical Union in the Teachings of Ibn ‘Arabī and Meister Eckhart. Medieval Mystical Theology, 22(1), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.1179/2046572613Z.0000000005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/2046572613Z.0000000005

Downloads

Published

2025-06-25

How to Cite

Marlichasia, M., Saputra, F., Salam, A., & Fatmawati, J. (2025). Konsep Ketuhanan dalam Filsafat Ibn ʻArabī dan Meister Eckhart: Dialektika antara Transendensi dan Immanensi. Kamali: Jurnal Ilmu Agama, 1(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.64691/kamali.v1i1.80