Reviewer Guidelines

Every manuscript submitted to Al-Qarawiyyin will undergo an initial selection process by the Editorial Team. This initial assessment aims to ensure the manuscript aligns with the journal's focus and scope, adheres to Al-Qarawiyyin's writing templates and guidelines, and meets academic and ethical standards for scientific publication. Manuscripts deemed to meet administrative and substantive requirements will be returned to the author for initial revision before being sent to reviewers for peer review.
Reviewers are expected to conduct their assessments objectively, fairly, and independently, and maintain the confidentiality of manuscripts, prioritizing academic integrity and avoiding conflicts of interest.

Title
Is the title of the article clearly, specifically, and informatively formulated, not exceeding 20 words, without the use of abbreviations, and accurately reflecting the substance, focus, and main variables of the research?

Abstract
Is the abstract concise and clear, covering the background of the problem, research objectives, methods used, main results, and conclusions, without citations, unusual abbreviations, or information irrelevant to the article's content?

Introduction
Does the introduction:

  • Present the general context and background of the problem logically and argumentatively?
  • Demonstrate the urgency and relevance of the research topic within current scientific discourse?
  • Contain a critical literature review of at least five relevant previous studies?
  • Clearly define the research gap?
  • State the problem statement, research objectives, and theoretical and/or practical contributions (novelty) explicitly and systematically?

Methods
Are the research methods described transparently, coherently, and replicable, including:

  • What approach and type of research were used?
  • Data collection techniques and procedures?
  • Data analysis techniques relevant to the research objectives?
  • Research location and subjects/objects (if any)?
  • Research instruments and explanations regarding validity and reliability (or data validity)?
  • Tools or software used (if relevant)?

Results and Discussion
Are:

  • The research results are presented objectively, systematically, and proportionally, either in narrative form, tables, or relevant figures?
  • Is the data presented consistent with the methods used?
  • The discussion is able to interpret the results analytically, linking them to theories, concepts, or previous research findings?
  • Do the results and discussion clearly address the research problem formulation and objectives?
  • Does dividing the discussion into subtopics (if any) help clarify the analytical flow and deepen the scientific argument?

Conclusion
Does the conclusion:

  • Summarize the main findings of the study concisely and accurately?
  • Convey the theoretical and/or practical implications of the research findings?
  • State the limitations of the study honestly and proportionately?
  • Provide relevant, findings-based suggestions or directions for further research?

Bibliography
Does:

  • The bibliography contains at least 20 relevant sources, consisting of primary and secondary sources?
  • Most of the references come from publications within the last 10 years?
  • Does the reference writing consistently follow APA 6th Edition style?
  • All in-text references are listed in the bibliography, and all references are referenced in-text (consistent citations)?