Hubungan Hadis Nabi dengan Akal: Studi Kritis Terhadap Wacana Ilmiah

Sulhayani Sulhayani

doi:10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i2.25

Authors

Sulhayani Sulhayani Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i2.25

Keywords:

Hadith of the Prophet; Reason, Scientific Discourse; Intellectual; Sunnah

Abstract

If the authenticity of a hadith is uncertain and contradicts reason, then the hadith is considered weak. However, if a hadith is considered authentic by hadith scholars, two different theories have emerged among scholars. The first theory argues that a true hadith never contradicts reason. According to this view, sound and clear reason will never contradict a sound hadith. On the contrary, the second theory argues that a hadith of the Prophet is considered weak if it contradicts reason. This study uses analytical and library research methods, utilizing various scientific works including books, articles, and writings of Muslim scholars. The findings of this study indicate that when a hadith, which is narrated through a strong chain of narrators and whose sanad continues to the Prophet, cannot contradict reason. However, if a hadith contradicts common sense, then it can be a valid reason to question its authenticity and consider it weak. Through a comprehensive analysis of scientific discourse, this study provides a deeper understanding of the complex relationship between hadith and reason and how Islam values reason. This underlines the importance of a rigorous authentication process, emphasizing the need to consider the reliability of the sanad of the hadith and the principles of intellectual reasoning when assessing the strength or weakness of a Prophetic hadith.

Author Biography

Sulhayani Sulhayani, Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan

Mahasiswa Program Sarjana Ilmu Hadis

References

Abbas, H. (2016). Kritik Matan Hadis Versus Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha. Kalimedia.

al-Aḥdab, K. M. S. (2021). Aṡar ‘Ilm Uṣūl al-Ḥadīṡ fī Tasykīl al-‘Aql al-Muslim. Dār al-Minhāj al-Qawīm.

al-‘Asqalānī, A. al-F. A. bin ‘Alī bin M. bin A. bin Ḥajar. (1997). Nukhbah al-Fikr. Dār al-Ḥadīṡ.

al-Baihaqī, A. bin al-Ḥusain bin ‘Alī bin M. al-K. al-K. A. B. (1989). al-Sunan al-Ṣagīr li al-Baihaqī (Vol. 2). Jāmi’ah al-Dirāsāt al-Islāmiyah.

al-Bukhārī, A. ‘Abdillāh M. bin I. (1993). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī (Vol. 6). Dār Ibnu Kaṡīr.

al-Dausarī, M. bin A. (2022). Asālīb al-Ḥadiṡiyīn fī al-Ṭa’n fī al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah.

al-Jauziyah, A. ‘Abdillāh M. bin A. B. bin A. I. Q. (2020). al-Ṣawā’iq al-Mursalah ‘alā al-Jahmiyah wa al-Mu’ṭalah (Vol. 2). Dār Ibnu Ḥazm.

al-Naisābūrī, A. al-Ḥusain M. bin al-Ḥajjāj al-Q. (1955). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim (Vol. 3). Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī.

al-Sibā’ī, M. (1993). Sunnah dan Peranannya Dalam Penetapan Hukum Islam, terj. Nurcholis Madjid. Pustaka Firdaus.

al-Sijistānī, A. D. S. bin al-A. bin I. bin B. bin S. bin ‘Amr al-A. (n.d.). Sunan Abū Dāwud (Vol. 3). al-Maktabah al-Iṣriyah.

al-Syarīf, A. & A. M. (2013). al-‘Alāqah bayn al-‘Aql wa al-Wahy wa An’akasatuha al-Fikriyah wa al-Tarbawiyah. Majallat Al-Manarah Lil-Buhuth Wal-Dirasat, 20(1), 241–263.

al-Ṭaḥḥān, M. (2015). Metode Takhrīj al-Ḥadith dan Penelitian Sanad Hadis, terj. HM. Ridlwan Nasir. IMTIYAZ.

al-Ṭayālisī, A. D. (1999). Musnad Abī Dāwud al-Ṭayālisī (Vol. 4). Dār al-Ḥijr.

al-Tirmiżī, M. bin ‘Īsā bin S. bin M. bin al-Ḍaḥḥāk A. ‘Īsa. (1975). Sunan al-Tirmiżī (Vol. 3). Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī.

Arifin, Z. (2018). Al-Ghazali’s Thought of Islamic Education And it’s Relevance with the Modern Education. Khalifa: Journal of Islamic Education, 2(1), 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/kjie.v2i1.18

Azhari, R. HJ. M. S. M. P. A. A. R. (2021). Wealth Planning Parameters Based on Maqaṣid Al-Shariʻah According to Ibn ʻAshur’s View: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies, 7(1), 31–46.

Barakāt, R. (2018). Ḥattā al-Imām Ibnu Taimiyyah Yuqaddimu al-‘Aql ‘alā al-Naql.

Cros, K. D. (2006). The Intellect in Islamic Thought: Mind and Heart. The Official Journal of the Centre for Civilisational Dialogue, 2(1), 1–16.

Fadl, K. A. El. (2015). The epistemology of the truth in modern Islam. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 41(4–5), 473–486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453715577739

Farida, U. (2020). Muḥammad Naṣr Al-Din Al-Albani and His Method of Correcting and Weakening the Hadith: a Critical Reading. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Quran Dan Hadis, 21(2), 411. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.2020.2102-09

Fāris, A. al-Ḥusain A. bin. (1986). Majmal al-Lugah li Ibni Fāris (Vol. 6). Mu’assasah al-Risālah.

Floridi, Luciano. J. C. M. B. R. C. P. C. V. D. C. L. R. M. U. P. F. R. B. S. P. V. & E. V. (2021). An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Ethics, Governance, and Policies in Artificial Intelligence, 144, 19–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81907-1_3

Gonibala, R. (2019). Manajemen Akal Dan Orientasi Studi Al-Quran Dan Al-Hadits. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 3(2), 283–294.

Haltinner, K. & D. S. (2021). The Nature and Nuance of Climate Change Skepticism in the United States. Rural Sociology, 86(4), 673–702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12371

Huda, K. (2019). Ilmu Matan Hadis. Yayasan Pengkajian Hadits el-Bukhari.

Ismail, M. S. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Hadis Nabi. PT Bulan Bintang.

Ismail, M. S. (2014). Kaidah Kesahihan Sanad Hadis: Telaah Kritis dan Tinjauan Dengan Pendekatan Ilmu Sejarah. PT Bulan Bintang.

Jafari, A. (2012). Islamic marketing: Insights from a critical perspective. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 3(1), 22–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831211206563

Karagözoǧlu, M. M. (2018). Contested Avenues in Post-Classical Sunni Hadīth Criticism: A Reading through the Lens of al-Mughni ’an al-Hifz wal-kitab. Journal of Islamic Studies, 29(1), 149–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etx079

Khaldūn, ‘Abdurraḥmān bin Ibnu. (1981). Tārīkh Ibnu Khaldūn (Vol. 1). Dār al-Fikr.

Mufliḥ, S. I. (2007). al-Adāb al-Syar’iyyah. Dār al-Irsyād.

Mustafa, Daud. A. J. B. A. Y. U. (2018). Impact Analysis of Islamic Finance on Financial Inclusion and Economic Growth in Selected Muslim Countries: Lessons for Nigeria. International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 26(2), 393–414.

Padela, A. I. & O. Q. (2019). Islamic Perspectives on Clinical Intervention Near the End of Life: We Can but Must We? . Death and Dying: An Exercise in Comparative Philosophy of Religion, 201–225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19300-3_13

Qodratullah, W. (2016). Konsep Ulul Albab Dalam Al Quran dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Difusi, 8(1), 17–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35313/sigmamu.v8i1.829

Rizapoor, Habiburrahman. A. P. & Z. A. (2023). The Relationship Between Prophetic Hadith and Intellect: A Critical Examination of the Scholarly Discourse. International Journal of Islamic Studies Higher Education, 2(2), 134–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/insight.v2i2.130

Rizapoor, H. & M. A. Z. (2021). A Critical Analysis Of The Existence Of Da’if Ḥadith (Weak Ḥadith) Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhari. Jurnal Ushuluddin, 29(1), 1–17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24014/jush.v29i1.11463

Rozak, A. & R. A. (2016). Ilmu Kalam. CV Pustaka Setia.

Ruwān, ‘Azaddīn. (2022). Majal al-‘Aql fi al-Naqd al-Hadithi ‘Ind al-Muhaddithin. Majallat Al-Buhūṭ al-‘Ilmiyyah Wa al-Dirāsat al-Islāmiyyah, 14(5), 11–44.

Saeed, A. (2020). The Role of Reason in Dealing with the Prophetic Sunna in Relation to the Chain of Narrators, Text and Indication. AlBayan, 18(1), 74–106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340081

Soetari, E. (2008). Ilmu Hadis: Kajian Riwāyah & Dirāyah. CV. Mimbar Pustaka.

Syaiful, M. (2022). Pemahaman Hadis Mengenai Anjuran Membunuh Cicak. IKLILA: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 5(1), 68–92.

Taimiyyah, T. al-D. A. al-‘Abbās A. bin ‘Abd al-Ḥalīm bin ‘Abd al-S. bin ‘Abdullāh bin A. al-Q. bin M. I. (1991). Dar’ Ta’āruḍ al-‘Aql wa al-Naql (Vol. 1). al-Mumlikah al-‘Arabiyyah al-Su’ūdiyyah.

Yaqub, A. M. (2020). Cara Benar Memahami Hadis. Pustaka Firdaus.