Determination of a Child’s Lineage in Genetic Donation-Based Reproductive Technology: A Contemporary Islamic Legal Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64691/jkw55r14Keywords:
Lineage, Genetic Donation, Islamic Law, Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah, Reproductive TechnologyAbstract
The development of reproductive technologies involving genetic donation decouples the marital, genetic, biological, gestational, and legal elements involved in procreation, thereby raising new issues regarding the criteria for establishing lineage in contemporary Islamic law. Existing fiqh debates tend to address reproductive technologies in a fragmented manner and fail to adequately resolve conflicts arising when genetic, biological, gestational, and legal parental identities reside in different individuals. This study aims to analyze the criteria for establishing lineage in reproduction involving genetic donation, compare contemporary Islamic legal arguments, and formulate a normative framework based on maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (the objectives of Sharia) that ensures certainty regarding a child’s identity and civil rights. Employing a normative legal research methodology, this study utilizes conceptual, statutory, and comparative approaches to analyze the Qur’an, Hadith, classical fiqh, contemporary fatwās, regulations, and academic literature. Sources were selected based on doctrinal relevance, classified according to marital status, genetic connection, gestation, and legal status, and analyzed through the principle of ḥifẓ al-nasl (preservation of lineage). The findings indicate that the marital relationship and the principle of firāsh (valid marriage as the basis for the legitimacy of a child’s status) remain the primary foundations for establishing lineage within Islamic legal constructs; conversely, a donor’s genetic contribution does not automatically create a lineage relationship or entail consequences regarding inheritance, guardianship, or maintenance nafaqah. Gestational ties are particularly significant in identifying maternity, while legal status must be determined based on a valid marriage and applicable legal provisions. Maqāṣid al-sharīʿah establishes the protection of a child’s identity, the clarity of lineage, and the certainty of civil rights as key evaluation parameters. This framework underscores the need to distinguish between genetic origins and legal lineage without compromising child protection.
References
‘Ābidīn, M. A. I. (1992). Radd al-Muḥtār ‘alā al-Durr al-Mukhtār. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.
Al-Islāmī, M. al-F. (1986). Qarār bi-Sha’n Aṭfāl al-Anābīb. Retrieved from Majmaʿ al-Fiqh al-Islāmī website: https://iifa-aifi.org/ar/1661.html
Al-Kāsānī, A. B. (1986). Badā’i‘ al-Ṣanā’i‘ fī Tartīb al-Sharā’i‘. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Nawawī, A. Z. M. al-D. Y. ibn S. (1991). Rawḍat al-Ṭālibīn wa ʿUmdat al-Muftīn. Beirut: al-Maktab al-Islāmī.
Al-Naysābūrī, A. al-Ḥusayn M. ibn al-Ḥajjāj al-Q. (1955). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Cairo: Muṣṭafā al-Bābī al-Ḥalabī.
Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (1980). al-Ḥalāl wa al-Ḥarām fī al-Islām. Cairo: Maktabat Wahbah.
Al-Ṣanʿānī, M. ibn I. al-A. (2002). Subul al-Salām. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah.
Al-Sarakhsī, M. ibn A. (1993). al-Mabsūṭ. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifah.
Al-Shirbīnī, S. al-D. M. ibn A. al-K. (1994). Mughnī al-Muḥtāj ilā Ma‘rifat Ma‘ānī Alfāẓ al-Minhāj. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Ṭabarī, A. J. M. ibn J. (2001). Jāmi’ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl Ay-l-Qur’ān. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥijr.
Al-Zuḥaylī, W. (1985). al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Adillatuh. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr.
Al-Zuḥaylī, W. (2009). al-Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al-‘Aqīdah wa ash-Sharī’ah wa al-Manhaj. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr.
Ali, Y. F. (2023). Islamic Perspectives on Fulfilling Husband’s Financial Responsibilities: Insights from Ulama Mazhab and Detained Citizenship. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 21(2), 312. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v21i2.2698
Aslati, Agustar, A., Silawati, Arisman, & Arafah, S. (2024). Utilizing Science and Maqāṣid al-Sharī’ah in Resolving Contemporary Issues of Islamic Family Law. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 18(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v18i1.10571
Ash-Shāṭibī, A. I. I. ibn M. ibn M. al-K. (1997). al-Muwāfaqāt fī Uṣūl al-Sharī’ah. Egypt: Dār Ibn ʿAffān.
Aulia, H., Hapsin, A., Junaidi, A. A., Himawanti, I., & Fauziah, N. (2025). The Evolution of Guardianship in the Religious Culture: From Terminology to Children’s Welfare. Mimbar Agama Budaya, 42(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.15408/mimbar.v42i1.45830
Authority, H. F. and E. (2021). Trends in Egg, Sperm and Embryo Donation 2020. Retrieved from https://www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/publications/research-and-data/trends-in-egg-sperm-and-embryo-donation-2020/
Battisti, D. (2024). Procreative Responsibility and Assisted Reproductive Technologies. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032654683
Bokek-Cohen, Ya’arit, Marey-Sarwan, I., & Tarabeih, M. (2022a). Underground Gamete Donation in Sunni Muslim Patients. Journal of Religion and Health, 61(4), 2905–2926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01440-1
Bokek-Cohen, Ya’arit, Marey-Sarwan, I., & Tarabeih, M. (2022b). Violating Religious Prohibitions to Preserve Family Harmony and Lineage among Sunni Muslims. Marriage & Family Review, 58(3), 245–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2021.1953667
Broke, M., Arifin, F., & Kartini, A. (2022). Postmortem Conception: Analyzing Jurisprudence and Ethics in Modern Reproductive Technology. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law, 5(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.35719/ijil.v5i1.2038
Brown, M., Flinn, C. J., & Mullins, J. (2025). Family Law Effects on Divorce, Fertility, and Child Investment. Journal of Labor Economics, 43(S1), S351–S397. https://doi.org/10.1086/734568
Cheina, S., Appoline, Z., Audrey, G., Carole, D., Catherine, G.-M., & Blandine, C. (2026). Pregnancy chances and obstetrical outcomes after egg donation according to the maternal indication. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 55(3), 103102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.103102
Chen, J. (2023). Donors: curious connections in donor conception. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters, 31(1), 2245617. https://doi.org/10.1080/26410397.2023.2245617
Dash, H. R., & Patel, A. (2025). Genealogically bewildered individuals and forensic identification: a review of current and emerging solutions. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 139(5), 2001–2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03513-2
Deonandan, R. (2020). Thoughts on the ethics of gestational surrogacy: perspectives from religions, Western liberalism, and comparisons with adoption. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 37(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01647-y
Elfia, E., Surwati, S., Nelli, F., & Fajri, Y. (2024). Gender Equality in Imamate Shia and Sunni Inheritance Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis of Legal Doctrines and Familial Relationships. Mazahib, 23(2), 555–594. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v23i2.8381
Fadel, M. (2022). DNA Evidence and the Islamic Law of Paternity in Light of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿa. The Muslim World, 112(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/muwo.12441
Farid, M. S. (2024). Ethical Issues in Sperm, Egg and Embryo Donation: Islamic Shia Perspectives. HEC Forum, 36(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-022-09498-4
Fristyarini, A., & Permana, M. Y. G. (2023). The Inheritance Status of Test Tube Baby Children in the Perspective of Islamic Law and Inheritance Law in Indonesia. WARAQAT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 8(1), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.51590/waraqat.v8i1.484
Goedeke, S., Daniels, K., Thorpe, M., & Du Preez, E. (2015). Building extended families through embryo donation: the experiences of donors and recipients. Human Reproduction, 30(10), 2340–2350. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev189
Ibn ‘Āshūr, M. Ṭāhir. (1998). Maqāṣid ash-Sharī‘ah al-Islāmiyyah. Amman: Dār al-Nafā’is.
Ibn Kathīr, A. al-F. I. ibn ‘Umar. (2004). Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm. Riyadh: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī.
Ibn Qudāmah, A. M. ‘Abd A. ibn A. ibn M. (1997). Al-Mughnī. Riyadh: Dār ‘Alim al-Kutub.
Imrie, S., Lysons, J., Jadva, V., Shaw, K., Grimmel, J., & Golombok, S. (2022). Parent–child relationship quality and child psychological adjustment in families created using egg donation: children’s perspectives at age 5 years. Human Reproduction, 37(3), 499–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab265
Ishii, T., & Beriain, I. de M. (2022). Shifting to a model of donor conception that entails a communication agreement among the parents, donor, and offspring. BMC Medical Ethics, 23(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-022-00756-1
Isley, L., Martin, D., Pandolfi, E., Berardino, T. Di, & Desai, V. (2024). International variability in regulatory requirements for sperm donors. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 48, 104056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.104056
Kirkman-Brown, J., Calhaz-Jorge, C., Dancet, E. A. F., Lundin, K., Martins, M., Tilleman, K., … Frith, L. (2022). Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation†. Human Reproduction Open, 2022(1), hoac001. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac001
Lind, C. (2024). Parenthood and parental responsibility: legal messaging and the power of law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2024.2414617
Mahendra, A. C. (2019). Ambiguity of Adultery Concept (Zina) in Criminal and Justice System (A Comparison between Indonesia, Pakistan, and Turkey). IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 4(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v4i1.19614
Mamou, G., Lagrange, C., Mendes, N., Wielart, J., Poirier, F., Medjkane, F., … Condat, A. (2020). The Developmental Implications of the Use of Reproductive Technologies for Transgender People: A Comparative Cross-Section Protocol. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 00243. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00243
Mangione, E. (2025). ‘Recombining’ biological motherhoods. Towards two ‘complete’ biological mothers. Journal of Medical Ethics, 51(3), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109610
Mathieson, I., & Scally, A. (2020). What is ancestry? PLOS Genetics, 16(3), e1008624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008624
Mayeur, A., Magnan, F., Mathieu, S., Rubens, P., Sperelakis Beedham, B., Sonigo, C., … Frydman, N. (2024). What importance do donors and recipients attribute to the nuclear DNA-related genetic heritage of oocyte donation? Human Reproduction, 39(4), 770–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae030
McCoy, D. E., Haig, D., & Kotler, J. (2024). Egg donation and gestational surrogacy: Pregnancy is riskier with an unrelated embryo. Early Human Development, 196, 106072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106072
Mustamam, Danialsyah, Harahap, N., Saputri, M. A., & Ariestino, L. (2025). Reinterpreting Ḥifẓ al-nasl in Contemporary Marriage Contracts: Navigating Islamic Normativity and State Law. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(2), 1258–1280. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11158
Nelson, B., & Wiles, A. (2022). A shifting ethical and legal landscape for sperm donation. Cancer Cytopathology, 130(8), 572–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22626
Nielsen, R., Akey, J. M., Jakobsson, M., Pritchard, J. K., Tishkoff, S., & Willerslev, E. (2017). Tracing the peopling of the world through genomics. Nature, 541(7637), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21347
Sameem, M. A., Rahmani, K. ul R., & Hilal, A. R. (2025). Nafaqah of a Wife in Islam: The Concept of Maintenance in Islamic Jurisprudence. Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(4), 912–933. https://doi.org/10.47760/cognizance.2025.v05i04.024
Symaniuk, E., Polyakova, I., & Menshikov, A. (2022). The Transformation of Family Ties as a Result of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. Quaestio Rossica, 10(2), 694. https://doi.org/10.15826/qr.2022.2.694
Wang, M., Chen, H., Luo, L., Huang, Y., Duan, S., Yuan, H., … He, G. (2025). Forensic investigative genetic genealogy: expanding pedigree tracing and genetic inquiry in the genomic era. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 52(4), 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgg.2024.06.016
Widbom, A., Isaksson, S., Sydsjö, G., Skoog Svanberg, A., & Lampic, C. (2021). Positioning the donor in a new landscape—mothers’ and fathers’ experiences as their adult children obtained information about the identity-release sperm donor. Human Reproduction, 36(8), 2181–2188. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab146
Wyverkens, E., Provoost, V., Ravelingien, A., Pennings, G., De Sutter, P., & Buysse, A. (2017). The Meaning of the Sperm Donor for Heterosexual Couples: Confirming the Position of the Father. Family Process, 56(1), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12156
Yusmita, Y., Sitorus, I. R., Shesa, L., Rachman, E. S., & Sa’adah, S. L. (2025). Legal Pluralism and the Transformation of Islamic Inheritance Law: A Study of Sasak Customary Practices in Indonesia. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(2), 831–852. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i2.12500
Zanchettin, L., Tallandini, M. A., Gronchi, G., Zito, G., Ricci, G., & Russo, L. R. (2022). The quality of parenting in reproductive donation families: A meta-analysis and systematic review. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 45(6), 1296–1312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.08.099
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mahmood Ali, Widad Mahdi Jasim, Nooruldeen Mustafa Kamil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
