Dataism as a New Religion? An Islamic Epistemological Critique of the Sacralization of Data in the Digital Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64691/avt3f023Keywords:
Dataism, Data Sacralization, Islamic Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, Digital ParadigmAbstract
The increasing dominance of algorithms, artificial intelligence, and big data systems in digital life has given rise to dataism as an epistemic paradigm that positions data as the primary source of truth’s legitimacy and the basis for social, economic, and moral decision-making. Studies on dataism are still largely dominated by Western epistemology and have yet to incorporate Islamic epistemology as a systematic, critical framework for data absolutization. This study aims to analyze the epistemic character of dataism and formulate an Islamic epistemological critique of the tendency to sacralize data in the digital paradigm. This research is a qualitative-conceptual study based on a literature review, using epistemological analysis, the philosophy of science, and philosophical criticism of technology approaches to dataism, alongside classical and contemporary Islamic epistemological thought. The results show that dataism constructs a reductionist knowledge structure by focusing on the validity of truth in terms of computational measurability, thereby subordinating ethical experience, rational reflection, and transcendent dimensions to algorithmic logic. This pattern produces a closed epistemic authority that functions like a secular belief system, positioning data as the final arbiter of reality and value. Islamic epistemology offers a corrective framework by integrating the senses, reason, and revelation within a hierarchy of knowledge that positions empirical data instrumentally rather than absolutely. These findings emphasize the importance of data’s epistemic boundaries and enrich the discourse on digital philosophy and technology ethics from a non-reductionist Islamic perspective.
References
Açıkgenç, A. (1996). Islamic Science: Towards a Definition. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.
Adamczyk, C. L. (2023). Communicating dataism. Review of Communication, 23(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15358593.2022.2099230
Al-Attas, M. N. (1978). Islam and Secularism. Pahang: Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995). Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition of the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1982). Islamization of Knowledge: General Principles and Work Plan. Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1992). Al Tawhid: Its Implications for Thought and Life. Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Asyibli, B., Ibtihal, A. A., Fauzan, M. F., Fauzi, A., & Hidayat, W. (2025). Epistemological Dimensions in Islamic Educational Philosophy: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 6(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.35719/jier.v6i1.464
Bakar, O. (1991). Classification of Knowledge in Islam: A Study in Islamic Philosophies of Science. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.
Bakar, O. (1999). The History and Philosophy of Islamic Science. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society.
Barry, L. (2020). The Quantified Self and the Digital Making of the Subject. In The Digital Age and Its Discontents: Critical Reflections in Education (pp. 95–110). Helsinki University Press. https://doi.org/10.33134/HUP-4-5
Binder, J. M. (2020). Romantic Disciplinarity and the Rise of the Algorithm. Critical Inquiry, 46(4), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.1086/709225
Bokulich, A., & Parker, W. (2021). Data models, representation and adequacy-for-purpose. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00345-2
Carpentier, N. (2025). Data, Information, Knowledge, and Wisdom: Toward a Recalibration of Human–Technology Relations. Emerging Media, 3(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543251365161
Carson, J. (2020). Quantification – Affordances and Limits. Scholarly Assessment Reports, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.29024/sar.24
Connor, S. (2025). The Affordances of Pragmatism for a Postdigital Citizen Social Science. Postdigital Science and Education, 7(1), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00529-6
Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
Degenhardt, F., Seifert, S., & Szymczak, S. (2019). Evaluation of variable selection methods for random forests and omics data sets. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 20(2), 492–503. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx124
DESA, U. N. (2024). United Nations E-Government Survey 2024. Retrieved from https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2024
Desai, J., Watson, D., Wang, V., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2022). The epistemological foundations of data science: a critical review. Synthese, 200(6), 469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03933-2
Development, O. for E. C. and. (2022). Going Digital to Advance Data Governance for Growth and Well-Being. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/going-digital-to-advance-data-governance-for-growth-and-well-being_e3d783b0-en.html
Dorschel, R. (2021). Discovering needs for digital capitalism: The hybrid profession of data science. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211040760
Downey, J., Harris, N., Rybczynska-Bunt, S., Golder, E., Shearn, K., & Bradley, N. (2024). Reflecting on Reflexivity in Realist Evaluation: A Call to Action. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241284206
Ferrario, A., Facchini, A., & Termine, A. (2024). Experts or Authorities? The Strange Case of the Presumed Epistemic Superiority of Artificial Intelligence Systems. Minds and Machines, 34(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09681-1
Forum, W. E. (2025). Blueprint for Intelligent Economies: AI Competitiveness through Regional Collaboration. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/publications/blueprint-for-intelligent-economies/
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Fukuda, H., Ma, N., Suzuki, S., Harasawa, N., Ueno, K., Gardner, J. L., … Nakahara, H. (2019). Computing Social Value Conversion in the Human Brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 39(26), 5153–5172. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3117-18.2019
Ghasemaghaei, M., & Turel, O. (2021). Possible negative effects of big data on decision quality in firms: The role of knowledge hiding behaviours. Information Systems Journal, 31(2), 268–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12310
Giannotta, A. P. (2022). Qualitative relationism about subject and object of perception and experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 21(3), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09710-1
Gray, C. (2023). More than Extraction: Rethinking Data’s Colonial Political Economy. International Political Sociology, 17(2), olad007. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olad007
Habeebullah, S. M., Wahyuni, S., Ekowati, N. A., & Otim, M. (2026). Fiqh of Artificial Intelligence in a Quranic Perspective: Normative Framework for the Use of AI in the Religious Sphere. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.64691/d6akkv87
Hansen, H. K. (2023). Governing through metrics in the digital age. Globalizations, 20(1), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2156700
Harari, Y. N. (2016). Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. London: Harvill Secker.
Harari, Y. N. (2017). Dataism Is Our New God. New Perspectives Quarterly, 34(2), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/npqu.12080
Hardy, L., Dixon, C., & Hsi, S. (2020). From Data Collectors to Data Producers: Shifting Students’ Relationship to Data. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 29(1), 104–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1678164
Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology. In W. Lovitt (Ed.), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays. New York: Harper & Row.
Jiang, L., Hwang, J. D., Bhagavatula, C., Bras, R. Le, Liang, J. T., Levine, S., … Choi, Y. (2025). Investigating machine moral judgement through the Delphi experiment. Nature Machine Intelligence, 7(1), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-024-00969-6
Klingbeil, A., Grützner, C., & Schreck, P. (2024). Trust and reliance on AI — An experimental study on the extent and costs of overreliance on AI. Computers in Human Behavior, 160, 108352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108352
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, F., & Ribes, D. (2025). Computational universalism, or, Attending to relationalities at scale. Social Studies of Science, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127251345089
Levin, J. (2021). Assessing Spirituality in a Diverse World. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(5), 3749–3752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01300-y
Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Quantitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264622
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Eds.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Mahmudulhassan, M., Abuzar, M., Khondoker, S. U. A., & Khanom, J. (2025). The Integration of Islamic Epistemology in Ethical and Multicultural Education: Pedagogical Strategies and Challenges. Multicultural Islamic Education Review, 2(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.23917/mier.v2i2.7612
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Mökander, J., & Schroeder, R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence, Rationalization, and the Limits of Control in the Public Sector: The Case of Tax Policy Optimization. Social Science Computer Review, 42(6), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393241235175
Nasr, S. H. (1987). Knowledge and the Sacred. New York: SUNY Press.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
Peters, M. A., Jandrić, P., & Hayes, S. (2021). Biodigital Philosophy, Technological Convergence, and Postdigital Knowledge Ecologies. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(2), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00211-7
Ramsälv, A., Ekström, M., & Westlund, O. (2024). The epistemologies of data journalism. New Media & Society, 26(11), 6307–6324. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221150439
Reinsel, D., Gantz, J., & Rydning, J. (2018). The Digitization of the World: From Edge to Core. Framingham: International Data Corporation.
Ricaurte, P. (2019). Data Epistemologies, The Coloniality of Power, and Resistance. Television & New Media, 20(4), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640
Ruckenstein, M., & Pantzar, M. (2017). Beyond the Quantified Self: Thematic exploration of a dataistic paradigm. New Media & Society, 19(3), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609081
Ruiz, N., Gallagher, M., & Najjuma, R. (2025). Postdigital Science and Education and The Majority World. Postdigital Science and Education, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-025-00545-0
Safrizal, M., Baker, S., Peterson, J., Amaefule, Z., & Hamad, K. S. (2026). The Transformation of Quranic Studies in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: An Epistemological Shift from Classical Scientific Tradition to the Digital Ecosystem. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.64691/d45aj033
Shirky, C. (2009). A Speculative Post on the Idea of Algorithmic Authority. Retrieved from Shirky.com website: http://shirky.com/weblog/2009/11/a-speculative-post-on-the-idea-of-algorithmic-authority/
Syafaq, H., Hilmy, M., Musyafaah, N. L., & Ali, M. R. A. A. (2023). Reconstructing Islamic Epistemology: Bridging Metaphysics, Reason, and Revelation. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf Dan Pemikiran Islam, 14(2), 240–269. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2024.14.2.240-269
Symons, J., & Alvarado, R. (2022). Epistemic injustice and data science technologies. Synthese, 200(2), 87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03631-z
Taylor, C. (2007). A Secular Age. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
UNESCO. (2024). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics
Uribe, D. A. (2023). A new religion for the 21st century: an interpretation of ‘dataism’ from the sociology of pierre bourdieu. The Journal of Psychology & Sociology, 85(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.26577/JPsS.2023.v85.i2.012
Winner, L. (1986). The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Yu, Z., Liang, Z., & Xue, L. (2022). A data-driven global innovation system approach and the rise of China’s artificial intelligence industry. Regional Studies, 56(4), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1954610
Zuboff, S. (2022). Surveillance Capitalism or Democracy? The Death Match of Institutional Orders and the Politics of Knowledge in Our Information Civilization. Organization Theory, 3(3), 1–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221129290
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hassan Anderl, Adeeb Obaid Alsuhaymi, Giullaume Heydarnia, Ledger Dhaene, Natalia Mykola Nikolaienko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
