Tajallī or the Computational Theory of Mind? Reconstructing the Ontology of Consciousness in Islamic Philosophy and Cognitive Science

Authors

  • Fahim Zenab Moghimi Khatam al-Nabieen University, Afghanistan Author
  • Mohammad Dawood Alawi Khatam al-Nabieen University, Afghanistan Author
  • Adam Shah Hassani Khatam al-Nabieen University, Afghanistan Author
  • Romzie Foroughi Islamic Institute of Tajikistan, Tajikistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64691/ykzjhq97

Keywords:

Tajallī, Computational Mind, Ontology of Consciousness, Reductionism, Cognitive Science

Abstract

The ontology of consciousness in contemporary debates arises from the tension between the metaphysical paradigm of Islamic philosophy and the physicalist approach in cognitive science, particularly regarding the explanation of qualia, intentionality, and the unity of conscious experience. In Islamic philosophy, the concept of tajallī views consciousness as a hierarchical manifestation of existential reality. In contrast, the computational theory of mind views mentality as the result of symbolic computation and neuronal processes grounded in physical systems. The absence of an integrative framework that explains the relationship between the phenomenological dimension and causal mechanisms leaves the dialogue between the two paradigms fragmented. This study aims to reconstruct a non-reductionist ontology of consciousness through a model of reality stratification that connects the metaphysical and computational dimensions without eliminating the differences in their ontic levels. The study uses a qualitative approach based on literature reviews, employing philosophical hermeneutics, ontological analysis, and comparative-integrative analysis of the main texts of Islamic philosophy, especially the concept of tajallī, as well as the latest cognitive science literature on computationalism, representationalism, and predictive processing. The results of this study indicate that tajallī operates within a gradational ontology that positions consciousness as an intensification of being with a relational-intentional structure. In contrast, computational theories of mind tend to be reductionistic, treating consciousness as a causal output of symbol manipulation and neuronal activity. The proposed reconstruction yields a stratified ontological model that accounts for the compatibility between phenomenal experience and causal explanation without reducing consciousness to a purely physical entity. This model broadens the horizon of dialogue between Islamic philosophy and contemporary consciousness studies and offers a conceptual alternative to the dominance of physicalism in consciousness theory.

References

’Arabī, M. al-D. I. (1980). Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam (A. al-‘Alā ’Afīfī, ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-’Arabī.

Akhmetova, I. A., & Tutkysheva, G. T. (2025). The Phenomenon of Volunteerism in al-Farabi’s Philosophy: The Spiritual Path to Happiness and Virtue. Bulletin of the Karaganda University History.Philosophy Series, 119(3), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.31489/2025HPh3/248-253

Aldea, A. S. (2020). Modality Matters: Imagination as Consciousness of Possibilities and Husserl’s Transcendental-Historical Eidetics. Husserl Studies, 36(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10743-020-09275-6

Bagasharov, A., Zhantaeva, M., Khalizhan, K., Kurmanbayev, Y., & Khaydarov, N. (2026). Epistemology of Interpretation in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Authority, Validity, and the Limits of AI’s Role in Quranic Interpretation. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.64691/21y5h822

Brown, R., Lau, H., & LeDoux, J. E. (2019). Understanding the Higher-Order Approach to Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(9), 754–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.06.009

Cao, R. (2022). Multiple realizability and the spirit of functionalism. Synthese, 200(6), 506. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03524-1

Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.

Chernus, V. (2021). Non-classical Intentionality: An Existential View. Filosofija. Sociologija, 32(1), 4374. https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v32i1.4374

Chittick, W. C. (1994). Imaginal Worlds: Ibn al-’Arabī and the Problem of Religious Diversity. Albany: SUNY Press.

Chittick, W. C. (1998). The Self-Disclosure of God: Principles of Ibn al-‘Arabī’s Cosmology. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477

Cohen, A. (2025). Quantities of Qualia. Current Anthropology, 66(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1086/734063

Colombo, M., & Piccinini, G. (2024). The Computational Theory of Mind. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009183734

Corbin, H. (1969). Creative Imagination in the Sufism of Ibn ’Arabī. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Cúrto, S. (2020). Sufi Qur’ānic Exegesis and Theomorphic Anthropology. TEOSOFI: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam, 10(1), 134–154. https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2020.10.1.134-154

da Cunha, Y., & Gibson, E. (2025). Syntactic Complexity Phenomena Are Better Explained Without Empty Elements Mediating Long‐Distance Dependencies. Cognitive Science, 49(8), e70088. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70088

Đorđević, S., & Ružić, G. (2024). The Analysis and Reexamination of Functionalism from the Perspective of Artificial Intelligence. Philosophia, 52(1), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-024-00719-3

Dushkin, R. V. (2022). Principles of Solving the Symbol Grounding Problem in the Development of the General Artificial Cognitive Agents. Informacionnye Tehnologii, 28(7), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.17587/it.28.368-377

Feinberg, T. E., & Mallatt, J. (2020). Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 01041. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01041

Ferrante, O., Gorska-Klimowska, U., Henin, S., Hirschhorn, R., Khalaf, A., Lepauvre, A., … Melloni, L. (2025). Adversarial testing of global neuronal workspace and integrated information theories of consciousness. Nature, 642(8066), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08888-1

Fodor, J. A. (1975). The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.

Forum, W. E. (2023). The Future of Jobs Report 2023. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/

Francén, R., & Stråge, A. (2025). A Problem for Multiply Realizable Mental Tokens. American Philosophical Quarterly, 62(4), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.5406/21521123.62.4.03

Friston, K. (2005). A theory of cortical responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360(1456), 815–836. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1622

Garcez, A. d’Avila, & Lamb, L. C. (2023). Neurosymbolic AI: the 3rd wave. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(11), 12387–12406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10448-w

Goff, P. (2019). Galileo’s Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness. New York: Pantheon Books.

Goldreich, M. (2025). Should the neuropsychoanalytic approach to the mind–body problem be re-framed in terms of transcendental idealism? Neuropsychoanalysis, 27(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/15294145.2024.2449324

Güler, S. (2025). Plotinos’ta Bilinç Kavramı. TSBS Bildiriler Dergisi, (4), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.55709/tsbsdergisi.637

Hashemi, A. (2025). A Panpsychist Solution to the Exclusion Problem. Acta Analytica, 40(3), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-024-00605-3

Headley, A. M., Wright, J. E., & Meier, K. J. (2021). Bureaucracy, Democracy, and Race: The Limits of Symbolic Representation. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13358

Ibrahim, T. (2020). Al-Farabi’s treatise “On Intellect” (Transl., foreword and comm. by T. Ibrahim). Orientalistica, 2(4), 954–982. https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7043-2019-2-4-954-982

Irawan, B., Nasution, I. F. A., & Coleman, H. (2021). Applying Ibn ʿArabī’s Concept of Tajallī: A Sufi Approach to Environmental Ethics. Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism, 10(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.21580/tos.v10i1.7204

Iyer, B. (2023). The Transimmanence of the Real: Ontological Pluralism in the School of Ibn ʻArabī. Religions, 14(7), 923. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14070923

Kaukua, J. (2021). The Heritage of Ibn Sīnā’s Concept of the Self. In The Self (pp. 55–72). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190087265.003.0003

Khemlani, S. S., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2017). Illusions in Reasoning. Minds and Machines, 27(1), 11–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-017-9421-x

Kreter-Schönleber, T., & Wolf, R. C. (2025). Transcendental philosophical and neuroscientific theories of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-025-10062-x

Lahav, N., & Neemeh, Z. A. (2022). A Relativistic Theory of Consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 704270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704270

Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company.

McCaffrey, G. (2024). Enactivism: Embodied cognition, sense‐making, and nursing. Nursing Inquiry, 31(4), 12672. https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12672

Montgomery, R. (2018). A new inverted spectrum thought experiment. Philosophical Studies, 175(8), 1963–1983. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0945-y

OECD. (2019). AI Principles. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/ai-principles.html

Peebles, G. (2021). Phenomenology and the unity of consciousness. Synthese, 199(3–4), 5455–5477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03031-9

Putnam, H. (2010). The nature of mental states. In H. Putnam (Ed.), Mind, Language and Reality (pp. 429–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625251.023

Putra, A. A., Kuswanjono, A., & Munir, M. (2021). Sufistic Consciousness as A Foundation of Religious Well-Being in Ibn ‘Arabi’s Teaching to Understanding Existential Uncertainty. Jurnal Theologia, 32(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.21580/teo.2021.32.2.9456

Raoul, L., & Grosbras, M.-H. (2023). Relating different dimensions of bodily experiences: Review and proposition of an integrative model relying on phenomenology, predictive brain and neuroscience of the self. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 148, 105141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105141

Razi, F. M. (2024). An Analysis of Mulla Sadra’s Thoughts on the Soul in the Context of Modern Mental Health. Journal on Islamic Studies, 1(3), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.35335/zazc2030

Saad, B. (2025). Grounding Causal Closure or Something Near Enough. Acta Analytica, 40(3), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-024-00620-4

Sadra, M. (1981). al-Ḥikmah al-Mutaʻāliyah fī al-Asfār al-ʻAqliyyah al-Arbaʻah. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyyah.

Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00005756

Shevlin, S., Castro, B., & Li, X. (2021). Computational materials design. Nature Materials, 20(6), 727–727. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01038-8

Spiegel, T. J. (2022). Normativity between Naturalism and Phenomenology. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 30(5), 493–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2022.2160782

Storm, J. F., Klink, P. C., Aru, J., Senn, W., Goebel, R., Pigorini, A., … Pennartz, C. M. A. (2024). An integrative, multiscale view on neural theories of consciousness. Neuron, 112(10), 1531–1552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.02.004

Strawson, G. (2017). Physicalist Panpsychism. In The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness (pp. 374–390). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119132363.ch27

UNESCO. (2024). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics

Wahbeh, H., Radin, D., Cannard, C., & Delorme, A. (2022). What if consciousness is not an emergent property of the brain? Observational and empirical challenges to materialistic models. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 955594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955594

Wahyudi, D., & Yunus, F. M. (2024). Al-Suhrawardi’s Knowledge Construction: A Philosophical Analysis of Illumination, Light, and Isyraqiyah Wisdom. Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 4(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.22373/jpi.v4i1.23293

Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology (D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne, eds.). New York: Free Press.

Wilson, J. M. (2021). Metaphysical emergence: next steps. In Metaphysical Emergence (pp. 282–286). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823742.003.0009

Yaqin, A., & Shobah, M. N. (2024). Re-Interpreting “God of Perception”: Understanding Cosmopolitan Sufism of Ibn Arabi. Proceedings of International Conference on Muslim Society and Thought, 4, 126–135. https://doi.org/10.15642/ICMUST.4.2024.1766

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

Moghimi, F. Z., Alawi, M. D., Hassani, A. S., & Foroughi, R. (2026). Tajallī or the Computational Theory of Mind? Reconstructing the Ontology of Consciousness in Islamic Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(2), 136-158. https://doi.org/10.64691/ykzjhq97