The Contestation of Interpretational Authority between ʻUlamāʻ and Artificial Intelligence: A Critical Study of AI Epistemology in Quranic Studies

Authors

  • Kutsal van den Berg Leiden University, Netherlands Author
  • Bart Bedner Leiden University, Netherlands Author
  • Martijn Zheng Leiden University, Netherlands Author
  • Philipp Grote University of Tübingen, Germany Author
  • Alisha Shema Islamic University of Applied Sciences Rotterdam, Netherlands Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64691/dh6rwb84

Keywords:

Interpretation Authority, Epistemology of Interpretation, Artificial Intelligence, Quranic Studies, Technology

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence in the analysis of religious texts has encouraged its use in Quranic studies, including in the practice of interpretation, which, in turn, raises fundamental epistemological issues in the form of contestation over interpretive authority between ʻulamāʻ as interpretive subjects and AI as a computational system. This issue not only addresses the technical aspects of producing meaning but also challenges the legitimacy of knowledge, sources of epistemic authority, and standards of interpretive validity. To date, studies that systematically formulate the epistemic boundaries and position of AI authority within the epistemological framework of Quranic interpretation are still relatively limited. This study aims to critically and conceptually analyze the epistemology of AI in Quranic studies, thereby confirming the position and limits of interpretive authority between ʻulamāʻ and artificial intelligence. This study employs a qualitative method, drawing on library studies of classical and contemporary interpretation literature, philosophy of science, and critical technology studies, with a philosophical-epistemological and hermeneutic analysis approach. The results of this study indicate that AI operates at the instrumental-operational level by processing textual data, linguistic statistics, and syntactic patterns, without the capacity for intentionality, historical awareness, and normative reflection, which are the epistemic prerequisites for Quranic interpretation. This finding confirms that the epistemic authority of interpretation remains with the ʻulamāʻ due to their involvement in hermeneutic awareness, mastery of scientific traditions, methodological responsibility, and ethical dimensions in the production of meaning. This study also reveals that the uncontrolled integration of AI has the potential to shift the standard of interpretation validity from epistemological considerations to the logic of technological efficiency. In conclusion, this study strengthens the epistemology of contemporary interpretation by formulating a relational framework that positions AI as a limited epistemic tool, rather than as a holder of interpretive authority.

References

Abalkheel, A., Sourani, M., & Zohbi, S. El. (2025). Structural Independence and Dialogic Coherence in Qur’anic Texts: A Syntactic Analytical Study. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(2), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8333

Akib, M. (2025). The Integration of Sanad in the Contextual Interpretation of the Qur’an: A Maqasid-Based Perspective. Al Muhafidz: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 5(2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.57163/almuhafidz.v5i2.190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.57163/almuhafidz.v5i2.190

Al-Qattān, M. (1973). Mabāḥith fī ʻUlūm al-Qurʻān. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah.

Al-Suyūṭī, Jalāl al-Dīn. (1974). al-Itqān fī ʻUlūm Al-Qurʻān. Egypt: al-Hay’ah al-Miṣriyyah.

Alavi, M., Leidner, D. E., & Mousavi, R. (2024). Knowledge Management Perspective of Generative Artificial Intelligence. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00859

Alomari, D., & Ahmad, I. (2024). Exploring Character Trigrams for Robust Arabic Text Classification: A Comparative Analysis in the Face of Vocabulary Expansion and Misspelled Words. IEEE Access, 12, 57103–57116. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3390048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3390048

Alyousef, A., Omari, A., & Mahafdah, R. (2025). Ethical Alignment in Large Language Models: Interpreting Moral Reasoning in Transformer-Based AI Systems. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(4), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i4.1089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i4.1089

Andok, M. (2024). The Impact of Online Media on Religious Authority. Religions, 15(9), 1103. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15091103

Ariyadri, A., & Anggriyani, A. (2025). Methodological Analysis Of Tafsîr Fî Zhilâl Al-Qur’ân: Between Reflective Approach And Epistemological Criticism. Civilization Research: Journal of Islamic Studies, 4(2), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.61630/crjis.v4i2.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61630/crjis.v4i2.109

Asnawi, A. R., Affani, S., & Hakamah, Z. (2021). Scientific Qur’anic Exegesis in Indonesia. Australian Journal of Islamic Studies, 6(4), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v6i4.401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v6i4.401

Avila, C., Ilbay, D., Tapia, P., & Rivera, D. (2025). Toward Responsible AI in High-Stakes Domains: A Dataset for Building Static Analysis with LLMs in Structural Engineering. Data, 10(11), 169. https://doi.org/10.3390/data10110169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/data10110169

Bashir, M. H., Azmi, A. M., Nawaz, H., Zaghouani, W., Diab, M., Al-Fuqaha, A., & Qadir, J. (2023). Arabic natural language processing for Qur’anic research: a systematic review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(7), 6801–6854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10313-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10313-2

Bhat, A. M., & Bisati, A. A. (2025). Rationality in the Qur’an: Integrating Reason and Revelation for Contemporary Islamic Education. Dirasah International Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v3i1.40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v3i1.40

Cabrera, Á. A., Tulio Ribeiro, M., Lee, B., Deline, R., Perer, A., & Drucker, S. M. (2023). What Did My AI Learn? How Data Scientists Make Sense of Model Behavior. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3542921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3542921

Calis, H. (2022). The Theoretical Foundations of Contextual Interpretation of the Qur’an in Islamic Theological Schools and Philosophical Sufism. Religions, 13(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020188

Carobene, A., Padoan, A., Cabitza, F., Banfi, G., & Plebani, M. (2024). Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 62(5), 835–843. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1136

Center, P. R. (2025). How People Around the World View AI. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2025/10/15/how-people-around-the-world-view-ai/

Chukhanov, S., & Kairbekov, N. (2024). The importance of a semantic approach in understanding the texts of the Holy Quran and Sunnah. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.36

Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2023). Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(4), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09409-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09409-w

Demircigil, B. (2025). The Conceptualization of Jurisprudential Exegesis as the Intersection of Tafsir and Fiqh: A Critical Approach. Religions, 16(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020254

Duguleană, M., Briciu, V.-A., Duduman, I.-A., & Machidon, O. M. (2020). A Virtual Assistant for Natural Interactions in Museums. Sustainability, 12(17), 6958. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176958

Fairfield, P. (2025). History and Hermeneutics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009607810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009607810

Faizan, M., Arif, M. S., Chattha, J. N., & Butt, F. A. (2024). Mel-Frequency-based Feature Analysis of Audio Signals in the Context of Holy Quran Recitation. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 49(5), 6971–6979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08555-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-023-08555-5

Gillespie, T. (2024). Generative AI and the politics of visibility. Big Data & Society, 11(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241252131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517241252131

Goetz, L., Seedat, N., Vandersluis, R., & van der Schaar, M. (2024). Generalization—a key challenge for responsible AI in patient-facing clinical applications. Npj Digital Medicine, 7(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01127-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01127-3

Hakim, M. F., & Nurrohim, A. (2025). Interpretation of The Process of Artificial Intelligence-based Human Creation: Between Chat GPT and Meta AI. Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity), 877–886. https://doi.org/10.23917/iseth.5474 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/iseth.5474

Helm, P., Bella, G., Koch, G., & Giunchiglia, F. (2024). Diversity and language technology: how language modeling bias causes epistemic injustice. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09742-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09742-6

Ignaco, M. A. E., & Ballera, M. A. (2025). Enhancing Bible Verse Search Through Topic Modeling: An LDA-Based Approach. 2025 International Conference on New Trends in Computing Sciences (ICTCS), 342–346. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTCS65341.2025.10989430 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTCS65341.2025.10989430

Jakesch, M., Hancock, J. T., & Naaman, M. (2023). Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(11), e2208839120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208839120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208839120

Junaidi, A., Amperawati, E. D., Dwianto, A., Putri, S. N., Rahmawati, R., & Sartono, S. (2025). The Role of Munasabah in Qur’anic Interpretation: Evolution, Practice, and Posthumanism Perspectives. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i1.920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/joph.v5i1.3502

Kaltsum, L. U., & Amin, A. S. (2024). The Development of Qur’anic Thematic Exegesis in Indonesia: Historical Landscape and Shifts of Authority. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis, 25(2), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v25i2.5422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v25i2.5422

Korneeva, E., Salge, T. O., Teubner, T., & Antons, D. (2023). Tracing the legitimacy of Artificial Intelligence: A longitudinal analysis of media discourse. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 192, 122467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122467 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122467

Lawson, T. (2021). The Cosmopolitan World of the Quran and Late Antique Humanism. Religions, 12(8), 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12080562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12080562

Li, R. (2024). A “Dance of storytelling”: Dissonances between substance and style in collaborative storytelling with AI. Computers and Composition, 71, 102825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2024.102825

Lucas, H. (2023). Negative Capabilities: Investigating Apophasis in AI Text-to-Image Models. Religions, 14(6), 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14060812 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14060812

Mendoza, J. A. G., Franco, H. H. M., & Torres, O. A. P. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Digital Marketing: Quantitative Analysis of Its Impact on Customer Personalization. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(6), 4206–4218. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2596 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i6.2596

Papakostas, C. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Religious Education: Ethical, Pedagogical, and Theological Perspectives. Religions, 16(5), 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16050563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16050563

Papayannopoulos, P. (2023). On Algorithms, Effective Procedures, and Their Definitions. Philosophia Mathematica, 31(3), 291–329. https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkad011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/philmat/nkad011

Rawanita, M., & Syabuddin, S. (2024). Scientific Interpretation and Its Significance in the Development of Science. ISTIFHAM: Journal Of Islamic Studies, 2(3 SE-), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.71039/istifham.v2i3.70 DOI: https://doi.org/10.71039/istifham.v2i3.70

Ridwan, M., Deswan, R. A., Afrizon, A., & Iska, S. (2024). Methods of Applying Hermeneutics in Interpreting The Qur’an and Sharh Hadith. Hamalatul Qur’an : Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Al Qur’an, 5(2), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.37985/hq.v5i2.254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/hq.v5i2.254

Rois, C., Muchlis, M., Irfan, A., Anam, H., & Rusdi, R. (2025). Islamic Hierarchy of Value: Abdullah Saeed’s progressive interpretation of the Qur’an. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 49(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v49i1.1125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v49i1.1125

Rozaq, A., Mubarok, H., Marom, M. A., & Ramadhan, F. (2025). Reclaiming Justice: Abu Zayd’s Contextual Hermeneutics and the Political Ethics of the Qur’an. An-Nur International Journal of The Quran & Hadith, 3(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.62032/aijqh.v3i1.82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62032/aijqh.v3i1.82

Saeed, A., & Akbar, A. (2021). Contextualist Approaches and the Interpretation of the Qur’ān. Religions, 12(7), 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070527

Sati, A., Halim, A., Nasution, A. H., & Ridwan, M. (2025). The Digital Transformation of Tafsir and Its Implications for Islamic Legal Derivation in the Contemporary Era. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(1), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10425

Schuh, J. (2024). AI As Artificial Memory: A Global Reconfiguration of Our Collective Memory Practices? Memory Studies Review, 1(2), 231–255. https://doi.org/10.1163/29498902-202400012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/29498902-202400012

Singer, D. J. (2021). To the Best of Our Knowledge. The Philosophical Review, 130(2), 323–326. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-8809997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-8809997

Stepanova, V. V., & Hachim, M. A. (2025). Rhetorical Devices of the Qur’an and their Translation into English and Russian: Patterns of Social Behavior in the Focus Creators. SKASE Journal of Translation and Interpretation, 18(1), 2–19. https://doi.org/10.33542/JTI2025-1-01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33542/JTI2025-1-01

Sunier, T., & Buskens, L. (2022). Authoritative Landscapes: The Making of Islamic Authority among Muslims in Europe. Journal of Muslims in Europe, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1163/22117954-bja10057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22117954-bja10057

Thomaskutty, J. (2023). A polyvalent hermeneutic of John 2:13-25: Theoretical and exegetical considerations. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1), 8157. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8157

Tursunalieva, A., Alexander, D. L. J., Dunne, R., Li, J., Riera, L., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Making Sense of Machine Learning: A Review of Interpretation Techniques and Their Applications. Applied Sciences, 14(2), 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020496 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app14020496

Ulum, L. B., Putri, N. A., & Farhati, N. (2024). Islam’s View of Pluralisme: A Study of Maudhu’i Tafsir. Bulletin of Islamic Research, 2(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.69526/bir.v2i3.31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69526/bir.v2i3.31

UNESCO. (2024). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/artificial-intelligence/recommendation-ethics

Uthman, Y. O. O.-O. (2021). The Evolution of Qur’anic Interpretation In the First Three Centuries of Islam. IJISH (International Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities), 4(2), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.26555/ijish.v4i2.4462 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26555/ijish.v4i2.4462

Wadud, A. (2021). Reflections on Islamic Feminist Exegesis of the Qur’an. Religions, 12(7), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070497 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070497

Wahyuni, A. E. D., Yaumi, M., Arsyad, A., & Husain, S. (2025). Integrasi Artificial Intelligence dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam [Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Religious Education Learning]. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 6(1), 1271–1280. https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v6i1.2625 DOI: https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v6i1.2625

Zulliandi, Y. B., Wulansari, I., & Aulia, N. (2025). The Transformation of Qur’an Interpretation and the Dynamics of Text Authority in Indonesia a Critical Analysis. MIYAH : Jurnal Studi Islam, 21(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.33754/miyah.v21i01.1270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33754/miyah.v21i01.1270

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

Berg, K. van den, Bedner, B., Zheng, M., Grote, P., & Shema, A. (2026). The Contestation of Interpretational Authority between ʻUlamāʻ and Artificial Intelligence: A Critical Study of AI Epistemology in Quranic Studies. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(1), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.64691/dh6rwb84