Epistemology of Interpretation in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: Authority, Validity, and the Limits of AI’s Role in Quranic Interpretation

Akhmetkazy Bagasharov; Mamyrova Zhantaeva; Kuzembayeva Khalizhan; Yemelianova Kurmanbayev; Nurgazy Khaydarov

doi:10.64691/21y5h822

Authors

Akhmetkazy Bagasharov Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan Author
Mamyrova Zhantaeva Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan Author
Kuzembayeva Khalizhan Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan Author
Yemelianova Kurmanbayev Egyptian University of Islamic Culture Nur-Mubarak, Kazakhstan Author
Nurgazy Khaydarov International Islamic Academy of Uzbekistan, Uzbekistan Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64691/21y5h822

Keywords:

Epistemology of Interpretation, Artificial Intelligence, Interpretive Authority, Epistemic Validity, Ethics of Technology

Abstract

The development of artificial intelligence in Islamic studies has transformed the landscape of the production and circulation of Quranic exegetical knowledge, while simultaneously raising epistemological issues that have not been systematically discussed, particularly regarding the shift in interpretive authority, the criteria for the validity of exegetical expertise, and the limits of technology’s role in understanding the sacred text. Previous studies tend to position AI as a technical instrument or discuss it normatively, while its epistemological implications for the structure and legitimacy of exegesis have received little attention. This article critically analyzes the relationship between Quranic exegesis and artificial intelligence by formulating the epistemological limits of AI’s role within the framework of contemporary exegetical epistemology. This study employs a qualitative approach, utilizing an epistemological-critical analysis method grounded in Islamic epistemology and contemporary philosophy of science, as reflected in classical and modern exegetical literature. The results reveal a shift in the pattern of exegetical authority, where AI serves as an epistemic mediator that facilitates linguistic, intertextual, and comparative analysis while remaining dependent on human interpretative authority. The construction of the data corpus determines the validity of AI-based interpretation, the epistemic assumptions internalized in the algorithm, and AI’s limitations in capturing the historical, social, and discursive context of the Quran. AI also lacks the reflective capacity, hermeneutic intentionality, and intellectual accountability that are essential requirements for interpretation. In conclusion, AI must be epistemologically positioned as an analytical aid, not an authoritative source of interpretation, with theoretical implications that strengthen the epistemological framework of interpretation, making it adaptive to technology without obscuring the principles of scientific validity and the authority of human interpreters.

References

Abalkheel, A., Sourani, M., & Zohbi, S. El. (2025). Structural Independence and Dialogic Coherence in Qur’anic Texts: A Syntactic Analytical Study. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(2), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i2.8333

Abdalhussein, H. F. (2025). Comparative Analysis Of AI And Human Translations Of Qur’anic Legal Verses In Surah Al-Ma’idah. Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning, 8(1), 262–277. https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v8i1.28804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v8i1.28804

Abdulaziz, E. (2025). At-Tafsīru al-‘Ilmiyyi fī Miṣra al-Ḥadīṡati. Middle Eastern Culture & Religion Issues, 4(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.22146/mecri.v4i1.18335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/mecri.v4i1.18335

Ahmad, I. (2025). Reinterpretasi Epistemologi Pendidikan Islam dalam Filsafat Al-Fārābī sebagai Solusi Krisis Makna Kurikulum Kontemporer [Reinterpretation of the Epistemology of Islamic Education in Al-Fārābī's Philosophy as a Solution to the Crisis of the Meaning of Contemporary Curriculum]. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.50

Ahmed, A., Ali, N., Alzubaidi, M., Zaghouani, W., Abd-alrazaq, A., & Househ, M. (2022). Arabic chatbot technologies: A scoping review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 2, 100057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2022.100057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2022.100057

Ahmed, S., Sumi, A. A., & Aziz, N. A. (2025). Exploring Multi-Religious Perspective of Artificial Intelligence. Theology and Science, 23(1), 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2024.2436783 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2024.2436783

Al Baihaqi, M. D. (2022). Unveiling the Implicit Message: A Comprehensive Exploration of Qur’anic Democracy using Ma’na-cum-Maghza Approach. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis, 23(2), 391–416. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v23i2.4616 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v23i2.4616

Alqarni, M. (2024). Embedding Search for Quranic Texts based on Large Language Models. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 21(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.34028/21/2/7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.34028/iajit/21/2/7

Alsaied, M. A. (2025). Interpretation of Religious Texts and Its Impact on Coexistence with Others. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(3), 1508–1528. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.944 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i3.944

Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645

Ariyadri, A., & Anggriyani, A. (2025). Methodological Analysis Of Tafsîr Fî Zhilâl Al-Qur’ân: Between Reflective Approach And Epistemological Criticism. Civilization Research: Journal of Islamic Studies, 4(2), 365–374. https://doi.org/10.61630/crjis.v4i2.109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61630/crjis.v4i2.109

Badawy, A. A. (2025). Topic Discovery in the Digital Quran: A Text Mining Approach. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(18), 642–649. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i18s.2976 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i18s.2976

Bashir, M. H., Azmi, A. M., Nawaz, H., Zaghouani, W., Diab, M., Al-Fuqaha, A., & Qadir, J. (2023). Arabic natural language processing for Qur’anic research: a systematic review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(7), 6801–6854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10313-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10313-2

Calis, H. (2022). The Theoretical Foundations of Contextual Interpretation of the Qur’an in Islamic Theological Schools and Philosophical Sufism. Religions, 13(2), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020188

Chukhanov, S., & Kairbekov, N. (2024). The importance of a semantic approach in understanding the texts of the Holy Quran and Sunnah. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.36 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.36

Confalonieri, R., Coba, L., Wagner, B., & Besold, T. R. (2021). A historical perspective of explainable Artificial Intelligence. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 11(1), e1391. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1391

Craft, J. T., Wright, K. E., Weissler, R. E., & Queen, R. M. (2020). Language and Discrimination: Generating Meaning, Perceiving Identities, and Discriminating Outcomes. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6(1), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011718-011659

Ding, W., Abdel-Basset, M., Hawash, H., & Ali, A. M. (2022). Explainability of artificial intelligence methods, applications and challenges: A comprehensive survey. Information Sciences, 615, 238–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.10.013

Dweirj, L. (2023). The Qur’an: An Oral Transmitted Tradition Forming Muslims Habitus. Religions, 14(12), 1531. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14121531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14121531

Eckart, L., Eckart, S., & Enke, M. (2021). A brief comparative study of the potentialities and limitations of machine-learning algorithms and statistical techniques. E3S Web of Conferences, 266, 02001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126602001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126602001

Ferrario, A., Facchini, A., & Termine, A. (2024). Experts or Authorities? The Strange Case of the Presumed Epistemic Superiority of Artificial Intelligence Systems. Minds and Machines, 34(3), 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09681-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09681-1

Gaanoun, K., & Alsuhaibani, M. (2025). Sentiment preservation in Quran translation with artificial intelligence approach: study in reputable English translation of the Quran. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 222. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04181-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04181-0

Ichwan, M. N., Ming, D., & Sya’roni, M. (2025). Bridging Tradition and Modernity: Integrating Classical Interpretation and Modern Hermeneutics through Ijtihad in Qur’an Studies. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.2021

Ilafi, B. S., & Nurrohim, A. (2025). Gender Interpretation Based on Artificial Intelligence: Between Chat GPT and Meta AI. Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity), 858–870. https://doi.org/10.23917/iseth.5472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/iseth.5472

John-Mathews, J.-M. (2022). Some critical and ethical perspectives on the empirical turn of AI interpretability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121209 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121209

Junaidi, A., Amperawati, E. D., Dwianto, A., Putri, S. N., Rahmawati, R., & Sartono, S. (2025). The Role of Munasabah in Qur’anic Interpretation: Evolution, Practice, and Posthumanism Perspectives. Journal of Posthumanism, 5(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.63332/joph.v5i1.920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33182/joph.v5i1.3502

Khodijah, S., & Musafa’ah, S. (2025). Recontextualizing Asbāb al-Nuzūl: From Micro-Historical Triggers to Macro-Ethical Frameworks within the Qur’anic Hierarchy of Values. Bulletin of Indonesian Islamic Studies, 4(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.51214/biis.v4i1.1384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51214/biis.v4i1.1384

Krenn, M., Pollice, R., Guo, S. Y., Aldeghi, M., Cervera-Lierta, A., Friederich, P., … Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2022). On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence. Nature Reviews Physics, 4(12), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00518-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00518-3

Lumbard, J. E. B. (2024). Islam and the Challenge of Epistemic Sovereignty. Religion, 15(4), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040406 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040406

Malhas, R., & Elsayed, T. (2022). Arabic machine reading comprehension on the Holy Qur’an using CL-AraBERT. Information Processing & Management, 59(6), 103068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103068

Mallick, S., & Mittal, M. (2025). AI-Based Model Order Reduction Techniques: A Survey. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 32(4), 2321–2346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10207-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-024-10207-2

Melbourne, U. of, & International, K. (2025). Trust, Attitudes and Use of Artificial Intelligence: A Global Study 2025. Retrieved from https://kpmg.com/xx/en/our-insights/ai-and-technology/trust-attitudes-and-use-of-ai.html

Mustafa, A., Nakhleh, S., Irsheidat, R., & Alruosan, R. (2024). Interpreting Arabic Transformer Models: A Study on XAI Interpretability for Quranic Semantic Search Models. Jordanian Journal of Computers and Information Technology, 10(4), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.5455/jjcit.71-1704878720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5455/jjcit.71-1704878720

Mutawali, M. (2023). Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘a as the Foundation of Islamic Moderation: Theo-Philosophical Insight against Extreme Religious Ideology. Ulumuna, 27(1), 341–366. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.560 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.560

Pedwell, C. (2024). Speculative machines and us: more-than-human intuition and the algorithmic condition. Cultural Studies, 38(2), 188–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2022.2142805 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2022.2142805

Pichan, M., & Ahmadnezhad, A. (2021). Historical and Scientific Contexts of the Tendency of Qur’anic Scholars to the Scientific Miracle (I’jāz) of the Qur’ān. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(10), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i10.2962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i10.2962

Putra, D. I. A., & Hidayaturrahman, M. (2020). The roles of technology in al-Quran exegesis in Indonesia. Technology in Society, 63, 101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101418 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101418

Rahmawati, D., Abouzeid, M. S., Nirwana AN, A., Hidayat, S., & Rhain, A. (2025). Investigating Online Quran Interpretation: Methods and Sources on Muslimah.or.id and its Contribution to Online Islamic Discourse. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 4(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.7322 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.7322

Ridwan, M. K. (2021). The Reflective-Accommodative Approach to the Quran: Ahmad Syafii Maarif’s Contribution towards Contemporary Approach to the Quran`. Ulumuna, 25(1), 199–227. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v25i1.432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v25i1.432

Rønn, K. V. (2022). The multifaceted norm of objectivity in intelligence practices. Intelligence and National Security, 37(6), 820–834. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2022.2076331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2022.2076331

Saeed, A., & Akbar, A. (2021). Contextualist Approaches and the Interpretation of the Qur’ān. Religions, 12(7), 527. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070527 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12070527

Salim, M. A., & Aditya, R. B. (2025). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Education: Trends, Methods, and Challenges in the Digital Era. Journal of Modern Islamic Studies and Civilization, 3(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.59653/jmisc.v3i01.1368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.59653/jmisc.v3i01.1368

Sati, A., Halim, A., Nasution, A. H., & Ridwan, M. (2025). The Digital Transformation of Tafsir and Its Implications for Islamic Legal Derivation in the Contemporary Era. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review, 4(1), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10425

Schwitzgebel, E. (2023). AI systems must not confuse users about their sentience or moral status. Patterns, 4(8), 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100818 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2023.100818

Sheth, A., Roy, K., & Gaur, M. (2023). Neurosymbolic Artificial Intelligence (Why, What, and How). IEEE Intelligent Systems, 38(3), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2023.3268724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2023.3268724

Stahl, B. C. (2023). Embedding responsibility in intelligent systems: from AI ethics to responsible AI ecosystems. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 7586. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34622-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34622-w

Stahl, B. C., Antoniou, J., Bhalla, N., Brooks, L., Jansen, P., Lindqvist, B., … Wright, D. (2023). A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(11), 12799–12831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10420-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-023-10420-8

Sukkar, A. W., Fareed, M. W., Yahia, M. W., Abdalla, S. B., Ibrahim, I., & Senjab, K. A. K. (2024). Analytical Evaluation of Midjourney Architectural Virtual Lab: Defining Major Current Limits in AI-Generated Representations of Islamic Architectural Heritage. Buildings, 14(3), 786. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14030786

Thaib, Z. H. (2023). Impact of Scientific Findings on the Interpretation of the Holy Qrʼan. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 10(7), 373–388. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.107.15098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.107.15098

Tigard, D. W. (2021). There Is No Techno-Responsibility Gap. Philosophy & Technology, 34(3), 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00414-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00414-7

Tirado-Olivares, S., Navío-Inglés, M., O’Connor-Jiménez, P., & Cózar-Gutiérrez, R. (2023). From Human to Machine: Investigating the Effectiveness of the Conversational AI ChatGPT in Historical Thinking. Education Sciences, 13(8), 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080803

Titus, L. M. (2024). Does ChatGPT have semantic understanding? A problem with the statistics-of-occurrence strategy. Cognitive Systems Research, 83, 101174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.101174

UNESCO. (2025). AI and the future of education. Disruptions, dilemmas and directions. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-and-future-education-disruptions-dilemmas-and-directions

Yadav, D. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Literary Analysis: A Computational Approach to Understand Literary Styles. International Journal of Emerging Knowledge Studies, 3(9), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-03-09-006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.70333/ijeks-03-09-006

Zaid, B., Fedtke, J., Shin, D. D., El Kadoussi, A., & Ibahrine, M. (2022). Digital Islam and Muslim Millennials: How Social Media Influencers Reimagine Religious Authority and Islamic Practices. Religions, 13(4), 335. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13040335

Zhang, J., Song, W., & Liu, Y. (2025). Cognitive bias in generative AI influences religious education. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 15720. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99121-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-99121-6