Gerakan Sosial Berbasis Gender di Media Sosial: Tinjauan Sosiologis terhadap Kampanye #MeToo dan #NikahMuda
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i1.36Keywords:
New Social Movements; Social Media; Gender; #MeToo; #YoungMarriageAbstract
Social media has become a new arena for the articulation of identity, struggle, and social change, including on gender issues. The #MeToo and #NikahMuda campaigns represent two gender-based social movements operating digitally, but with opposing orientations and narratives: one is emancipatory and critical of sexual violence, while the other tends to be conservative and promotes local religious or cultural values about early marriage. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of these two campaigns sociologically by exploring the construction of gender meanings constructed through social media and uncovering the terrain of contestation between modern and traditional values. The study uses a descriptive qualitative method with data collection techniques through social media observation, documentation of campaign posts, and literature studies. The analysis is conducted using the approach of new social movement theory and the social construction of gender. The results show that #MeToo functions as a medium of resistance against patriarchal structures and opens up space for victim narratives, while #NikahMuda emphasizes the idealization of women's roles in the domestic sphere and social reproduction. Both campaigns use visual strategies, emotional narratives, and religious/cultural symbolism to build legitimacy. However, #MeToo tends to disrupt dominant norms, while #NikahMuda seeks to affirm existing norms. In conclusion, social media has become a terrain for contesting the meaning of gender between emancipatory and conservative discourses, reflecting the complexity of power relations, identity, and values in contemporary digital society.
References
Al Akash, Ruba, and Morgen A. Chalmiers. 2021. “Early Marriage among Syrian Refugees in Jordan: Exploring Contested Meanings through Ethnography.” Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters 29(1):287–302. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2021.2004637.
Armstrong, Cory L., and Jessica Mahone. 2023. “#Metoo in Practice: Revisiting Social Media’s Influence in Individual Willingness to Mobilize against Sexual Assault.” Feminist Media Studies 23(1):185–98. doi: 10.1080/14680777.2021.1944258.
Bakar, Abu, and Zulfirman Manik. 2024. “Hadith Content About Women on Instagram: Analysis of Religious Account Strategies to Attract Followers.” Al-Fikru: Jurnal Ilmiah 18(2):173–91. doi: 10.51672/alfikru.v18i2.441.
Bao, Jingran. 2025. “On the Impact of Social Media on the Dissemination of Gender Equality Ideology.” Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences 51:194–99. doi: 10.54097/v1rbc738.
Bwirire, Dieudonne, Rik Crutzen, Edmond Ntabe Namegabe, Rianne Letschert, and Nanne de Vries. 2022. “Health Inequalities in Post-Conflict Settings: A Systematic Review.” PLoS ONE 17(3 March):1–22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265038.
Franssen, Gaston. 2020. “Celebrity in the #MeToo Era.” Celebrity Studies 11(2):257–59. doi: 10.1080/19392397.2020.1751493.
Gibson, Camille, Shannon Davenport, Tina Fowler, Colette B Harris, Melanie Prudhomme, Serita Whiting, and Sherri Simmons-Horton. 2019. “Understanding the 2017 ‘Me Too’ Movement’s Timing.” Humanity & Society 43(2):217–24. doi: 10.1177/0160597619832047.
Harahap, Alwi Padly, Khairin Nazmi, and M. Fajri Yusuf. 2025. “Kontekstualisasi Hadis Tentang Puasa Dan Relevansinya Dalam Mencegah Pelecehan Seksual Terhadap Perempuan Di Indonesia.” Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan 19(1):119–38. doi: 10.35931/aq.v19i1.4006.
Harahap, Alwi Padly, Rahmi Syahriza, and Asrar Mabrur Faza. 2024. “The Transformation of Understanding Hadith in the Post-Multimedia Era: Balancing Technological Advancements with Tradition Preservation.” Jurnal Living Hadis 9(2):1–21. doi: 10.14421/livinghadis.2024.5798.
Is, Fadhilah, Alwi Padly Harahap, and Manal Mohey Eddien Sharief. 2025. “The Concept Of Family Resilience Towards The Issue Of Infidelity In Households: Analysis of the Hadith Al-Ifki.” TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 24(1):80–107. doi: 10.30631/tjd.v24i1.568.
Lall, Ruchika, Rashee Mehra, and Malavika Narayan. 2023. “Co-Producing Knowledge in Action: Reflecting from the Main Bhi Dilli Campaign for Equitable Planning in Delhi.” Planning Theory 23(4):356–76. doi: 10.1177/14730952231184339.
Muslikhati, Siti. 2004. Feminisme Dan Pemberdayaan Perempuan Dalam Timbangan Islam. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.
Nazmi, Khairin, Tutia Rahmi, and Alwi Padly Harahap. 2025. “Keutuhan Harmoni Rumah Tangga Perspektif Hadis: Menghindari Stigma Sosial Di Aplikasi Tiktok Sebagai Standar Kebahagiaan Keluarga.” Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan 19(1):358–75. doi: 10.35931/aq.v19i1.4358.
Nurhayati, Sri Suci, and Filosa Gita Sukmono. 2022. “Gender Advocacy, Social Media Campaign to Against Sexual Violence.” Pp. 76–82 in HCI International 2022 – Late Breaking Posters, edited by C. Stephanidis, M. Antona, S. Ntoa, and G. Salvendy. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Ritonga, Nuh Ahmad Syarodzi, Muhammad Darmawan Saputra, Noval Al Nafiz Siregar, Alwi Padly Harahap, and Uqbatul Khair. 2023. “Efektivitas Bimbingan Untuk Calon Pengantin Dalam Mewujudkan Keluarga Yang Sakinah Di Kantor KUA Tembung Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan.” As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga 5(2):560–68. doi: 10.47467/as.v5i2.2803.
Sembiring, Muhammad Ismailsyah, and Zulfirman Manik. 2025. “INSTAGRAM AS A STAGE FOR PREACHING: Exploring the Values of Hadith in Buya Syakur’s Sufi Advice.” TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin 24(1):50–79. doi: 10.30631/tjd.v24i1.567.
Stier, Sebastian, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, and Markus Strohmaier. 2018. “Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter.” Political Communication 35(1):50–74. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728.
Zeng, Jing. 2020. “#MeToo as Connective Action: A Study of the Anti-Sexual Violence and Anti-Sexual Harassment Campaign on Chinese Social Media in 2018.” Journalism Practice 14(2):171–90. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2019.1706622.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hayatun Nufus Caniago

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











