Taʻāwun dan Tradisi Pemotongan Lembu pada Peristiwa Kematian: Dialog Tafsir al-Misbah dan Tafsir Ibn Kaṡīr atas Surah al-Mā’idah Ayat 2

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64691/aj7qd476

Keywords:

Taʻāwun, Comparative Tafsīr, Ibn Kaṡīr, al-Misbah, Traditions of Death

Abstract

The practice of slaughtering cattle in the event of death in some Muslim communities raises normative tensions when confronted with the concept of taʻāwun in Surah al-Mā’idah: 2, which emphasizes cooperation in virtue and piety. This phenomenon shows the ambiguity between social solidarity and the potential shift in the value of worship into a socio-economic burden that causes problems. The study focuses on the interpretive dialogue between Tafsir Ibn Kaṡīr and Tafsir al-Misbah to examine the construction of the meaning of taʻāwun and its relevance in assessing the social practice of death. A qualitative approach based on literature studies is used, with a comparative analysis of the interpretations of both commentators, accompanied by a contextual reading of social reality. The results of the analysis show differences in epistemological orientation; Ibn Kaṡīr emphasizes the normative-textual dimension by affirming the boundary between virtue and practices that have the potential to lead to bidʻah, while Quraish Shihab offers a contextual reading with an emphasis on the value of benefit, social empathy, and the rationality of practice. The main findings indicate that taʻāwun is not merely symbolic cooperation, but rather an ethical principle that requires proportionality, non-burdensomeness, and alignment with the objectives of sharia. Theoretical implications point to strengthening an integrative approach to social interpretation. In contrast, practical implications emphasize the need to reconstruct traditions to align with collective virtues without creating socio-economic pressure on society.

References

Al-Asfahānī, A. Q. A. al-Ḥusayn ibn M. al-R. (2009). al-Mufradāt fī Gharīb Al-Qur’ān (Ṣafwān ‘Adnān Dāwūd, ed.). Damaskus: Dār al-Qalam.

Al-Dimasyqī, A. M. ‘Izzuddīn ‘Abdul ‘Azīz bin ‘Abdussalām bin A. al-Q. bin al-Ḥasan al-S. (1991). Qawā’id al-Aḥkām fī Maṣāliḥ al-Anām. Kairo: Maktabah al-Kulliyāt al-Azhariyyah.

Al-Jawharī, I. ibn Ḥammād. (1987). Al-Ṣiḥāḥ Tāj al-Lughah wa Ṣiḥāḥ al-’Arabiyyah (A. ’Abd al-G. ’Aṭṭār, ed.). Beirut: Dār al-’Ilm li al-Malāyīn.

Al-Rāzī, A. ‘Abd A. M. ibn ‘Amr ibn al-Ḥasan ibn al-Ḥusayn al-T. (2001). Mafātiḥ al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-’Arābī.

Al-Ṭabarī, A. J. M. ibn J. (2001). Jāmi’ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl Ayi Al-Qur’ān. Kairo: Dār al-Ḥijr.

Alfani, I. H. D., Mukhsin, M., Khusnadin, M. H., Chodijah, S., & Luthfia, A. D. (2025). Qur’anic perspective of gender equality: Classical and modern tafsir. Gender Equality: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies, 11(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.22373/equality.v11i1.26296

Asrin, Anshori, A., Shonhaji, Mawardi, Imron, I., & Setiawati, R. (2024). The Ideal Pattern of Social Integration Based on the Quran (Thematic Study of Verses on Social Integration). AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis, 8(3), 659–674. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v8i3.11330

Hamdan, M. N., Ramli, M. A., Zaman Huri, N. M. F., Abd Rahman, N. N. H., & Abdullah, A. (2021). Will Muslim consumers replace livestock slaughter with cultured meat in the market? Trends in Food Science & Technology, 109, 729–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.034

ʻĀsyūr, M. al-Ṭāhir I. (1985). al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Tunisia: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah.

Ibn Farīs, A. Ḥusayn A. (1979). Mu’jam Maqāyis al-Lughah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Ibn Kaṡīr, A. al-F. I. ibn ‘Umar. (2004). Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān al-‘Aẓīm. Riyadh: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī.

Mawarni, A., & Nasution, M. A. A. (2025). Parenting Orphans Through the Lens of Tafsir Al-Misbah: A Case Study at An-Nur Orphanage, Medan. TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v10i1.30728

Meliani, F. (2026). Reconstructing Qur’anic Social Ethics: A Thematic Exegesis of Ta’awun and Its Implications for Social Assistance Governance in Indonesia. Al Muhafidz: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 6(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.57163/h23sbf25

Musili, T. K. (2025). Exploring the Economies of Transnational Death Rituals amongst Kenyan immigrant religious communities. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(4), 4017. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.4017

Muthoifin, Afiyah, I., & Nuha. (2024). Behavioral responses of cows and goats during slaughtering for Eid Al-Adha: A field study in Surakarta. Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology, 12(4), 2024034. https://doi.org/10.31893/jabb.2024034

Nasrullah, I., Murtadho, M. A. C., & Umami, K. (2026). Textual Authority and Exegetical Method in Salafi Tafsir: Reassessing Ibn Kathir in Contemporary Qur’anic Studies. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 5(1), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v5i1.15951

Shihab, M. Q. (2010). Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Sholikhah, R. L., Al-Mujtahid, N. M., & Ramadhan, A. R. (2025). Challenging the Misconception of Rituals: An Islamic Theological Critique of the Hidden Violence in the Practice of Animal Slaughter. Pharos Journal of Theology, 106(4), 403. https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.106.403

Siregar, I. R., Rababah, M. A., Amiruddin, A., Akhyar, A., & Hasibuan, S. W. (2024). Tradition and Transformation: Islamic influence on animal slaughter in Padang Bolak funeral customs. el Harakah: Jurnal Budaya Islam, 26(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.18860/eh.v26i1.26545

Syafira, K., Ghozali, A. M., Windari, F., & Yanuri, R. (2025). The Value of Mutual Assistance (Ta’awun) in the Qur’an and Its Relevance to the Sakai Sambayan Tradition of the Lampung Community. QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies, 4(2), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i2.13219

Downloads

Published

2026-09-29

How to Cite

Nasution, U. K., Zein, A., & Ginting, E. B. (2026). Taʻāwun dan Tradisi Pemotongan Lembu pada Peristiwa Kematian: Dialog Tafsir al-Misbah dan Tafsir Ibn Kaṡīr atas Surah al-Mā’idah Ayat 2. Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial Dan Multidisiplin, 2(3), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.64691/aj7qd476