Kepemimpinan Keluarga dalam Al-Qur’an dan Transformasi Relasi Keluarga Perkotaan: Perspektif Tafsir Al-Azhar Karya Hamka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64691/5fh59751Keywords:
Qiwāmah, Tafsir al-Azhar, Hamka, Urban Family, Contextual InterpretationAbstract
The dynamics of urban family relations demonstrate shifts in authority, role negotiations, and the intensification of equality values that often clash with Qur’anic norms regarding family leadership. The focus of this study is the concept of qiwāmah in Hamka’s Tafsir al-Azhar and its relevance in a pluralistic, complex modern context. A qualitative approach based on literature studies is used, employing thematic and contextual interpretation analysis to examine verses on family leadership and Hamka’s interpretation within a socio-cultural framework. The results of this study reinterpret qiwāmah as ethical leadership grounded in responsibility, moral capacity, and competence, rather than in gender-based structural domination. Hamka’s interpretation displays conceptual flexibility that creates space for a proportional distribution of roles in urban families, while emphasizing the principles of justice, deliberation, and collective responsibility. The dialectic between text and context demonstrates the integration of Qur’anic normative values with contemporary social realities through adaptive readings that maintain the substance of the teachings without ignoring social change. These findings strengthen the position of contextual interpretation as an approach capable of bridging the tension between religious norms and the transformation of the modern family, while also providing theoretical contributions to the development of thematic interpretation studies and Islamic family studies in the global urban landscape.
References
Adams, M. M., & Miller, J. G. (2022). The flexible nature of everyday reciprocity: reciprocity, helping, and relationship closeness. Motivation and Emotion, 46(4), 461–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-022-09949-y
Awalul, A., Mawariza, P., Syah, J. A., & Nuranisah, N. (2025). Maqāṣidī’s Approach to Qiwāmah and Nafaqah. al Hairy | Journal of Islamic Law, 1(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.64344/hry.v1i2.69
Barassi, V. (2020). Datafied times: Surveillance capitalism, data technologies and the social construction of time in family life. New Media & Society, 22(9), 1545–1560. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820913573
Budiman, I. (2021). The Islamic Perspective on The Improvement of Family Economy in The New Normal. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 5(1), 252. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.8389
Buyukkececi, Z., Levanon, A., Fasang, A. E., Kraus, V., & Saburov, E. (2025). Women’s work-family trajectories and earnings by ethno-religious groups in Israel: More equality in the public sector? Advances in Life Course Research, 63, 100659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2025.100659
Carlson, M. W., & Hans, J. D. (2020). Maximizing benefits and minimizing impacts: dual-earner couples’ perceived division of household labor decision-making process. Journal of Family Studies, 26(2), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2017.1367712
Evans, A. (2018). Cities as Catalysts of Gendered Social Change? Reflections from Zambia. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 108(4), 1096–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1417820
Fatimah, A., & Ikram, R. (2025). Redefining Qiwāmah as a Transformative Approach to Gender Role Sharing and Redressing Toxic Masculinities in Muslim Communities. AL-ĪMĀN Research Journal, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.63283/IRJ.03.02/01
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. California: University of California Press.
Glavin, P., Schieman, S., & Bierman, A. (2024). From flexibility to unending availability: Platform workers’ experiences of work–family conflict. Journal of Marriage and Family, 86(3), 574–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12977
Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hamka. (1990). Tafsir Al-Azhar. Singapura: Pustaka Nasional PTE LTD Singapura.
Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.
İsrafiloğlu, F. (2025). The Qur’ān and Value Conflicts in Marriage in the Modern Era. Diyanet İlmi Dergi, 61(4), 1341–1376. https://doi.org/10.61304/did.1723044
Karimli, L., Lecoutere, E., Wells, C. R., & Ismayilova, L. (2021). More assets, more decision-making power? Mediation model in a cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of the graduation program on women’s empowerment in Burkina Faso. World Development, 137, 105159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105159
Loginov, D. (2021). Traditional and new patterns of today’s urban youth demographic behavior. Population, 24(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.19181/population.2021.24.2.15
Lubiewska, K., Głogowska, K., Sümer, N., Żegleń, M., & Mądrzycka-Borska, Z. (2023). Is distanced mothering a neglectful or normative parenting strategy? Evidence from three countries. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 96, 101842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101842
Mansour, S., Saleh, E., & Al-Awadhi, T. (2020). The Effects of Sociodemographic Characteristics on Divorce Rates in Oman: Spatial Modeling of Marital Separations. The Professional Geographer, 72(3), 332–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2020.1730196
Mujahidin, A., Itmam, M. S., & Rofiq, A. C. (2024). The Dynamic of Contextualization in Indonesian Qur’anic Tafsirs: A Comparative Study of Tafsir Al-Azhar and Tafsir Al-Mishbāh on The Story of The Prophet Moses. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Hadis, 25(2), 221–246. https://doi.org/10.14421/qh.v25i2.5397
Munirah, N., Norhayatun, N., Hasan, A. M., & Mahfodz, W. H. (2026). From Maryam to Musawah: The Evolution of Muslim Feminist Thought in Advocating Family Rights and Equality in Islamic Law. Arba: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.64691/72afxb53
Osamor, P. E., & Grady, C. (2018). Autonomy and couples’ joint decision-making in healthcare. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-017-0241-6
Pluut, H., Ilies, R., Su, R., Weng, Q., & Liang, A. X. (2022). How social stressors at work influence marital behaviors at home: An interpersonal model of work–family spillover. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 27(1), 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000298
Pratiwi, E. A. S., Othman, A., Daulay, R. H., Sahara, D., & Rahman, Z. (2026). Women’s Leadership in the Quran: A Critical Analysis of Contemporary Muslim Interpretation and Social Practice. Arba: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2(2), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.64691/ms4sxm74
Rasool, A. (2024). The Dynamics Of Urbanization On Family Structures: A Study In Islamabad, Pakistan. Migration Letters, 21(S13), 1279–1295. https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v21iS13.11657
Rawluk, A., Ford, R., Anderson, N., & Williams, K. (2019). Exploring multiple dimensions of values and valuing: a conceptual framework for mapping and translating values for social-ecological research and practice. Sustainability Science, 14(5), 1187–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0639-1
Saaka, S. A., & Luginaah, I. (2025). Do women’s autonomy lessen the brunt of unequal household responsibilities in the patriarchal context of semi-arid Northern Ghana? PLOS One, 20(10), e0335142. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335142
Salam, M. T., Nasution, R. A., & Siregar, A. D. (2026). Thematic Analysis of Men’s Roles in Gender Justice According to the Quran: Domestic and Public Perspectives. Arba: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.64691/xehgtr46
Tafkir, M., Hidayat, Z., & Ayob, M. A. bin. (2026). Deconstructing Patriarchy in Islam: An Analysis of Asma Barlas’ Unreading Concept of the Patriarchal Interpretation of the Quran. Arba: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 2(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.64691/tqrng369
Visscher, A. H., Boele, S., & Denissen, J. J. A. (2023). Unraveling the Bidirectional Associations between Parental Knowledge and Children’s Externalizing Behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(4), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01743-4
Yuki, M., & Schug, J. (2020). Psychological consequences of relational mobility. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.029
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nurhamida Hasibuan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.











