Disinformasi Digital dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an: Tafsir Tematik atas Ayat-Ayat Tabayyun di Era Algoritma

Authors

  • Qonita Fathin Suhaila Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Author
  • Nazwa Nadia Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Author
  • Farid Adnir Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64691/4428nb14

Keywords:

Tabayyun, Digital Disinformation, Thematic Interpretation, Epistemology of the Qur’an, Information Algorithm

Abstract

The rise of digital disinformation in algorithm-based communication ecosystems has changed the mechanisms of information production, distribution, and consumption, thereby increasing the opportunity for the spread of misleading information through the logic of virality, content personalization, and the reinforcement of cognitive biases. This condition places the concept of tabayyun in the Qur’an as a relevant epistemological framework for examining the contemporary information crisis. This study aims to analyze the concept of tabayyun in the Qur’an, trace the genealogy of misleading information from a Qur’anic perspective, identify the Qur’anic epistemological critique of the logic of algorithms and the culture of virality in the Qur’an, and explain the relevance of the verses of tabayyun in understanding the dynamics of digital disinformation. This research is a qualitative, literature-based study with a thematic interpretation (mawḍūʻī) approach to verses on tabayyun, information, lies, prejudice, and news dissemination. The results of the study indicate that the Qur’an establishes an information verification system that places source checking, fact validation, evaluation of informant credibility, and control of prejudice as prerequisites for the formation of valid knowledge. The Quran also identifies factors contributing to the emergence of misleading information, such as haste in accepting news, the dominance of prejudice, information manipulation, and the reproduction of news without adequate verification. The Quran’s critique of accepting information without evidence closely aligns with the algorithmic problem of amplifying content without regard for its validity. Thus, tabayyun is a fundamental epistemological principle that remains relevant as an analytical tool for addressing the information crisis and disinformation in the algorithmic era.

References

Abu Bakar, A. Y., Fazial, F., Abdullah, S. R., Mohd Taher, N. H., Kasim, N. H., & Abdul Hamid, M. S. (2024). The Concept of Tabayyun in Dissemination of Information Through Mass Media. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(1), 2630–2642. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i1/20693

Al-Fayrūzābādī, A. Ṭāhir M. ibn Y. (2005). al-Qāmūs al-Muḥīṭ. Beirut: Muʻassasah al-Risālah.

Al-Ghazālī, M. (1994). Qaḍāyā al-Mar’ah Bayn al-Taqālīd al-Rākidah wa al-Wāfidah. Mesir: Dār al-Syurūq.

Al-Ifrīqī, M. ibn M. ibn ‘Alī A. al-F. J. I. M. al-A. (1999). Lisān al-‘Arāb. Beirut: Dār al-Ṣadr.

Al-Nawawī, A. Z. M. al-D. Y. ibn S. (1976). al-Minhāj Syarḥ Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim bin al-Ḥajjāj. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʻ al-Turāṡ al-ʻArabī.

Al-Qurṭubī, A. ‘Abdillāh M. ibn A. al-A. (1964). al-Jāmi’ li Aḥkām Al-Qur’ān (A. Al-Birdūnī & I. Aṭfīsy, ed.). Kairo: Dār al-Kutub al-Miṣriyyah.

Al-Ṭabarī, A. J. M. ibn J. (2001). Jāmi’ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl ai Al-Qur’ān. Kairo: Dār al-Ḥijr.

Al-Zuḥaylī, W. (2009). Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al-‘Aqīdah wa al-Syarī’ah wa al-Manhaj. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr.

Apuke, O. D., Omar, B., Tunca, E. A., & Gever, C. V. (2024). Information overload and misinformation sharing behaviour of social media users: Testing the moderating role of cognitive ability. Journal of Information Science, 50(6), 1371–1381. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221121942

Aulia, Q. N., Al Ayubi, S., & Rosyadi, S. (2025). Critical Thinking Dalam Al-Qur’an: Studi Tafsir Tematik dan Implementasinya di Era Digital. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 4(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v4i1.473

Berg, K. van den, Bedner, B., Zheng, M., Grote, P., & Shema, A. (2026). The Contestation of Interpretational Authority between ʻUlamāʻ and Artificial Intelligence: A Critical Study of AI Epistemology in Quranic Studies. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.64691/dh6rwb84

Bontridder, N., & Poullet, Y. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in disinformation. Data & Policy, 3, e32. https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.20

Chen, T., Yin, X., Yang, J., Cong, G., & Li, G. (2021). Modeling Multi-Dimensional Public Opinion Process Based on Complex Network Dynamics Model in the Context of Derived Topics. Axioms, 10(4), 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms10040270

Cruz-Cárdenas, J., Ramos-Galarza, C., Giménez-Baldazo, M., & Palacio-Fierro, A. (2025). A review of consumer-to-consumer digital information and knowledge sharing. Management Decision, 63(13), 96–122. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2024-0869

El Mikati, I. K., Hoteit, R., Harb, T., El Zein, O., Piggott, T., Melki, J., … Akl, E. A. (2023). Defining Misinformation and Related Terms in Health-Related Literature: Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e45731. https://doi.org/10.2196/45731

Firmansyah, Kurnia, S. S., Wiksana, W. A., Fadhli, A., Azzahra, S., & Cahyaning, R. (2025). Communication with Tabayyun on Negative Issues of Presidential Candidates on Social Media. Mediator: Jurnal Komunikasi, 18(1), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v18i1.5297

Forum, W. E. (2024). The Global Risks Report 2024. Diambil dari https://www.weforum.org/publications/global-risks-report-2024/

Freelon, D., & Wells, C. (2020). Disinformation as Political Communication. Political Communication, 37(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755

Guess, A. M., & Lyons, B. A. (2020). Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda. In Social Media and Democracy (hal. 10–33). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960.003

Guess, A. M., Malhotra, N., Pan, J., Barberá, P., Allcott, H., Brown, T., … Tucker, J. A. (2023). How do social media feed algorithms affect attitudes and behavior in an election campaign? Science, 381(6656), 398–404. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abp9364

Hastuti, H., Maulana, H. F., Lawelai, H., & Suherman, A. (2025). Algorithmic influence and media legitimacy: a systematic review of social media’s impact on news production. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1667471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1667471

ʻĀsyūr, M. al-Ṭāhir I. (1985). al-Taḥrīr wa al-Tanwīr. Tunisia: al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah.

Ibn Farīs, A. Ḥusayn A. (1979). Mu’jam Maqāyis al-Lughah. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.

Is, F., Harahap, A. P., & Eddien Sharief, M. M. (2025). The Concept of Family Resilience Towards the Issue of Infidelity in Households: Analysis of the Hadith al-Ifki. TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 24(1), 80–107. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v24i1.568

Kaṡīr, A. al-F. I. ibn ‘Umar ibn. (2004). Tafsīr Al-Qur'an al-‘Aẓīm (A. Ghoffar & A. I. Al-Atsari, ed.). Bogor: Pustaka Imam asy-Syafi’i.

Lu, Y., Schaefer, J., Park, K., Joo, J., & Pan, J. (2024). How Information Flows from the World to China. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 29(2), 305–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221117470

Maalsen, S. (2023). Algorithmic epistemologies and methodologies: Algorithmic harm, algorithmic care and situated algorithmic knowledges. Progress in Human Geography, 47(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221149439

Mahasneh, A. A. (2023). (Re)constructing Narratives in Qur’an Translation. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 23(2), 101–124. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v23i2.455

Mäkelä, M., Björninen, S., Karttunen, L., Nurminen, M., Raipola, J., & Rantanen, T. (2021). Dangers of Narrative: A Critical Approach to Narratives of Personal Experience in Contemporary Story Economy. Narrative, 29(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1353/nar.2021.0009

Masri, D., & Warsodirejo, P. P. (2023). The Implementation of the Tabayyun Concept in Learning Islam to Enhance Attitudes of Religious Moderation. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 853–862. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2592

Mattingly, D. C., & Yao, E. (2022). How Soft Propaganda Persuades. Comparative Political Studies, 55(9), 1569–1594. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211047403

Mernissi, F. (1993). Women and Islam: An Historical and Theological Enquiry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Murtiningsih, & Adeoye, M. A. (2025). Hoaxes in Islamic Perspective: Qur’anic Solutions for Building an Anti-Hoax Society. Al-Karim: International Journal of Quranic and Islamic Studies, 3(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.33367/al-karim.v3i1.6818

Piduru, B. R. (2022). Evaluating Personalization Algorithms in Social Media: Balancing User Engagement and Privacy. Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Cloud Computing, 1(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.47363/JAICC/2022(1)194

Purnama, R. F. (2021). The Concept of Tabayyūn in the Qur’ān: Efforts to Address the Spread of Information on Social Media. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir, 6(1), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.32505/at-tibyan.v6i1.2372

Ranalli, C., & Malcom, F. (2025). What’s so bad about echo chambers? Inquiry, 68(10), 3984–4026. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2023.2174590

Rhodes, S. C. (2022). Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Fake News: How Social Media Conditions Individuals to Be Less Critical of Political Misinformation. Political Communication, 39(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2021.1910887

Ridha, M. R., & Abduh, M. (2008). Tafsīr al-Manār. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.

Rifqa, Z., Shidqon, A., & Tumewu, N. P. (2023). Resistance to Economic Oligarchy in the Al-Quran through the Lens of Tafsir Nuzuli. TAFSE: Journal of Qur’anic Studies, 8(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.22373/tafse.v8i2.20585

Ruan, T., Liu, Q., & Chang, Y. (2025). Digital media recommendation system design based on user behavior analysis and emotional feature extraction. PLOS One, 20(5), e0322768. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322768

Safrizal, M., Baker, S., Peterson, J., Amaefule, Z., & Hamad, K. S. (2026). The Transformation of Quranic Studies in the Era of Artificial Intelligence: An Epistemological Shift from Classical Scientific Tradition to the Digital Ecosystem. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 2(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.64691/d45aj033

Salovich, N. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2021). Misinformed and unaware? Metacognition and the influence of inaccurate information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47(4), 608–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000977

Savhira D.L., R., Alaika, A. M. B. K. P., & Firdaus, D. (2020). Called Al-Qur’an Digital Perspective: Answer To Raising Hoax In Era Of Disruption. Tribakti: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 31(2), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.33367/tribakti.v31i2.1063

Shihab, M. Q. (1996). Wawasan Al-Quran: Tafsir Tematik atas Pelbagai Persoalan Umat. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Shihab, M. Q. (2010). Tafsir al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati.

Suswita, S. (2025). Antara Taklid dan Ijtihad: Dialektika Pembentukan Nalar Kritis Siswa dalam Pendidikan Islam. Al-Qarawiyyin: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 1(3), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.64691/al-qarawiyyin.v1i3.52

Talamanca, G. F., & Arfini, S. (2022). Through the Newsfeed Glass: Rethinking Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers. Philosophy & Technology, 35(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00494-z

Tellis, G. J., MacInnis, D. J., Tirunillai, S., & Zhang, Y. (2019). What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence. Journal of Marketing, 83(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919841034

Till, C. (2021). Propaganda through ‘reflexive control’ and the mediated construction of reality. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1362–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820902446

Vaccari, C., & Chadwick, A. (2020). Deepfakes and Disinformation: Exploring the Impact of Synthetic Political Video on Deception, Uncertainty, and Trust in News. Social Media + Society, 6(1), 2056305120903408. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120903408

Zhang, Y., & Gosline, R. (2023). Human favoritism, not AI aversion: People’s perceptions (and bias) toward generative AI, human experts, and human–GAI collaboration in persuasive content generation. Judgment and Decision Making, 18, e41. https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2023.37

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Suhaila, Q. F., Nadia, N., & Adnir, F. (2026). Disinformasi Digital dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an: Tafsir Tematik atas Ayat-Ayat Tabayyun di Era Algoritma. Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial Dan Multidisiplin, 2(2), 125-144. https://doi.org/10.64691/4428nb14