Relasi Keluarga dalam Surah Ṭāhā ayat 29–32: Analisis Komparatif Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī dan Tafsīr al-Munīr

Authors

  • Zubeir Batubara Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64691/mvfamm46

Keywords:

Family Relations; Surah Ṭāhā; Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī; Tafsīr al-Munīr; Comparative Tafsīr

Abstract

The study of family relations in the Quran has conceptual significance because the family verses not only represent personal relationships, but also contain constructions of authority, social ethics, and cooperation patterns that impact the formation of social order. Surah Ṭāhā verses 29–32, which record the Prophet Moses’ request regarding Aaron’s role as a companion and strengthener of the mission, becomes an important locus for reading the differences in classical and contemporary interpretive approaches in interpreting family relations. The purpose of this study is to comparatively analyze the construction of family relations, the distribution of authority, and the dimensions of social ethics in Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī and Tafsīr al-Munīr to identify the shift in interpretive paradigms. The method used is a qualitative study based on a literature study with a comparative analysis approach of interpretations, using Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī as a representation of classical interpretation based on riwāyah and Tafsīr al-Munīr as a representation of contemporary interpretation that is integrative and contextual. The analysis shows that Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī constructs family relations within the framework of the legitimacy of prophetic authority and functional-instrumental kinship, with an emphasis on the sanad of narration and initial consensus as determinants of meaning. In contrast, Tafsīr al-Munīr constructs family relations as a model of ethical collaboration that emphasizes competence, communication, and social responsibility, so that the relationship between Musa and Harun is understood as a prototype of participatory leadership relevant to the modern social context. This difference reflects the epistemological transformation from normative-historical interpretation to normative-contextual interpretation, while also confirming the contribution of this study to the development of Quranic exegesis studies in reading family verses dynamically and in layers.

References

Al-Hawary, S. I. S., Kumar, T., Pallathadka, H., Alshahrani, S. H., Al-Tamimi, H. A. N. M., Muda, I., & Singer, N. (2023). The education of children in an Islamic family based on the Holy Qur’an. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1), 8273. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8273

Al-Suyūṭī, ‘Abdurraḥmān bin Abī Bakar Jalāluddīn. (1974). al-Itqān fī ʻUlūm Al-Quran. Mesir: al-Hai’ah al-Misriyyah.

Al-Ṭabarī, A. J. M. bin J. (2001). Jāmi’ al-Bayān ‘an Ta’wīl ai Al-Qur’ān. Kairo: Dār al-Ḥijr.

Al-Zuḥailī, W. (2009). Tafsīr al-Munīr fī al-‘Aqīdah wa al-Syarī’ah wa al-Manhaj. Damaskus: Dār al-Fikr.

Aminah, S., & Rohmana, J. A. (2025). Interpretation of Gender Verses According to Imam Al-Tabarī and Asma Barlas: A Comparative Study. International Journal of Nusantara Islam, 13(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v13i1.44547

Firestone, R. (2024). The Prophet Problem. Religions, 15(11), 1406. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111406

Hasan, M. A. K. (2021). The Tafsīr Bi Al-Ma’ṡūr and Bi Al-Ra’yī in The Commentary of Abū Ja’far Al- Ṭaḥāwī: (Study in Aḥkām Al-Qur’ān Al-Karīm). Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an, 17(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.21009/JSQ.017.2.02

Is, F., Harahap, A. P., & Eddien Sharief, M. M. (2025). The Concept of Family Resilience Towards the Issue of Infidelity in Households: Analysis of the Hadith al-Ifki. TAJDID: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, 24(1), 80–107. https://doi.org/10.30631/tjd.v24i1.568

Islamiyah. (2022). Metode dan Corak Kitab Tafsir Al-Tafsīr Al-Munīr. Al-Thiqah: Jurnal Ilmu Keislaman, 5(2), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.56594/althiqah.v5i2.77

Mahdor, M. M. (2021). Eksistensi Hewan Herbivora dalam Al-Qur’an (Kajian Tematik Tafsir Al-Munir Karya Wahbah Az-Zuhaili). Al Muhafidz: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 1(2), 108–120.

Nations, U. (2025). World Youth Report 2025. New York. Retrieved from https://social.desa.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/2025-12/World-Youth-Report-2025.pdf

Organization, W. H. (2022). World report on violence and health. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241545615

Sofan, M., Wage, W., & Darojat, D. (2025). Islamic Aqidah Education for Families in View of the Perspective of Alqur’an Surah Luqman Verses. Journal La Sociale, 6(2), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v6i2.1917

Syarifuddin, M., & Azizy, J. (2020). The Meanings and Significances of Moses’ Prayers in The Qur’an: From Tabari to Khazin. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2nd International Colloquium on Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies (ICIIS) in Conjunction with the 3rd International Conference on Quran and Hadith Studies (ICONQUHAS). EAI. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.7-11-2019.2294573

UNESCO. (2025). Family and Intergenerational Literacy and Learning: International Perspectives. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000393131

Zaripov, I. A. (2024). The traditional and rational in the exegetical methodology of Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (839–923). Minbar. Islamic Studies, 17(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.31162/2618-9569-2024-17-1-82-96

Downloads

Published

2026-03-01

How to Cite

Batubara, Z. (2026). Relasi Keluarga dalam Surah Ṭāhā ayat 29–32: Analisis Komparatif Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī dan Tafsīr al-Munīr. Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial Dan Multidisiplin, 2(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.64691/mvfamm46