Metode Integratif Takhrīj Hadis: Prosedur Sistematis Penelusuran Sanad dan Matan dalam Studi Interdisipliner
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.117Keywords:
Takhrīj Hadith; Sanad; Matn; Contextual; IntegrativeAbstract
Methodological fragmentation in the practice of takhrīj hadith remains a fundamental problem in contemporary hadith studies, primarily due to the separation of sanad analysis and matn analysis, which proceeds partially and uncoordinated within a unified procedural framework. This condition results in a weak consistency in the historical assessment of hadith and limits the analytical exploration of the dynamics of transmission and the construction of hadith meaning. This article aims to formulate an integrative and systematic takhrīj hadith method by positioning sanad and matn analysis as two interrelated dimensions in an interdisciplinary study process. This study uses a qualitative research type based on a literature study with the main data sources being classical and contemporary works in the science of hadith, as well as supporting literature from historical and social science studies. The analytical approach is carried out through the integration of sanad criticism, matn criticism, and contextual reading of the social, intellectual, and historical conditions of the narration. The results show that the integrative takhrīj hadith method has the main character of a logical unity between the verification of transmission lines, evaluation of the coherence and substance of matn, and analysis of the context of hadith production and reproduction. The stages of this method include comprehensive mapping of the sanad, examining the relationship between the sanad and the text (matn), and synthesizing contextual analysis as the basis for historical assessment of hadith. This integration forms a methodological logic that is not linear, but rather dialogical and reflective. The implications of this research emphasize the importance of reformulating the takhrīj hadith methodology to be more adaptive, systematic, and relevant for the development of contemporary hadith studies oriented toward historical accuracy and analytical rigor.
References
Abbas, H. (2016). Kritik Matan Hadis Versus Muhaddisin dan Fuqaha. Yogyakarta: Kalimedia.
Abu Zayd, N. H. (1990). Naqd al-Khiṭāb al-Dīnī. Kairo: Sīnā li al-Naṣr.
Aini, N. Q., & Shihab, M. F. (2025). Analysis of Sanad and Matan in the Hadith on the Characteristics of Hypocrites: Study of Takhrij Hadith. Journal of Takhrij Al-Hadith, 4(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.15575/jth.v4i1.43781
Al-Baghdādī, A.-K. (2011). al-Kifāyah fī ‘Ilm al-Riwāyah. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Idlibī, Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn bin Aḥmad. (1983). Manhaj Naqd al-Matn ‘inda ‘Ulamā’ al-Ḥadīṡ al-Nabawī. Beirut: Dār al-Afāq al-Jadīsudah.
Al-Qaraḍāwī, Y. (1993). Kayfa Nataʻāmal maʻa al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah (M. Al-Baqir, ed.). Bandung: Penerbit Karisma.
Al-Qāsimī, M. J. bin M. S. bin Q. (1993). Qawā’id al- Taḥdīṡ min Funūn Muṣṭalaḥ al-Ḥadīṡ. Beirūt: Dār al-Kutb al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Al-Ṣalāḥ, ‘Uṡmān bin ‘Abd al-Raḥmān Abū ‘Amr Taqī al-Dīn al-Ma’rūf bi Ibnu. (1986). Ma’rifah Anwā’ ‘Ulūm al-Ḥadīṡ. Suriyā: Dār al-Fikr.
Al-Suyūṭī, ‘Abd al-Raḥmān bin Abī Bakr Jalāl al-Dīn. (1996). Tadrīb al-Rāwī fī Syarḥ Taqrīb al-Nawawī. Dār al-Ṭayyibah.
Al-Ṭaḥḥān, M. (1991). Uṣūl al-Takhrīj wa Dirāsat al-Asānīd. Riyad: Maktabah al-Ma’rifah.
Azmi, A. M., Al-Qabbany, A. O., & Hussain, A. (2019). Computational and natural language processing based studies of hadith literature: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 52(2), 1369–1414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-019-09692-w
Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation Of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Halimah, A. M., & Bosehah, A. A. (2024). The Translation of Hadiths on Prophet Muhammad’s Personal Attributes: A Foreignising Approach. World Journal of English Language, 15(3), 203. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n3p203
Hallaq, W. B. (2005). The Origins and Evolution of Islamic Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harahap, A. P., Is, F., & Julaiha P, J. (2025). Examining Ḥadīth on Women as a Source of Fitna: Thematic and Contextual Approaches. Australian Journal of Islamic Studies, 10(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v10i2.745
Harahap, A. P., Siregar, H. Y., Rahmi, T., Hasibuan, M. H., Siregar, R. H., & Akbar, F. (2025). Martahi Martulpak Tradition : Living Hadith as a Means of Shaping Social and Cultural Norms of the Mandailing Community. Jurnal SMaRT (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, Dan Tradisi), 11(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.18784/smart.v11i1.2681
Ihsan, M., & Sabarudin, S. (2023). Understanding Normative and Historical Islamic Approaches in Islamic Studies: Islamic Religious Education Studies. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2), 3360–3373. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v7i2.6946
Kawaid, A. I. S. D., Sobali, A. M., & Bakar, A. I. A. (2021). Faedah Takhrij Hadis kepada Sanad Dan Matan: Satu Kajian Analisis. Maʿālim Al-Qurʾān Wa Al-Sunnah, 17(2), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v17i2.285
M Azizan, A. S., Mohamed Nor, Z., & Mohd Hamdan, M. A. (2024). Metodologi Kritikan Sanad Riwayat Sirah: Satu Kajian Terhadap Akram Ḍiyā’ Al-ʿumarī Dalam Karyanya Al-Sīrah Al- Nabawiyyah Al-Ṣaḥīḥah. Journal Of Hadith Studies, 9(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.33102/johs.v9i1.289
Motzki, H. (1991). The Musannaf of ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Ṣanʿānī as a Source of Authentic Aḥādīth of the First Century A.H. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 50(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1086/373461
Motzki, H. (2002). The Origins of Islamic Jurisprudence: Meccan Fiqh before the Classical Schools. Leiden: Brill.
Motzki, H., Voort, N. B. der, & Anthony, S. W. (2010). Analysing Muslim Traditions: Studies in Legal, Exegetical and Maghazi Hadith. Leiden: Brill.
Novera, M., & A’yun, V. Q. (2024). Kritik Sanad dan Matan. DIRAYAH : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 4(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.62359/dirayah.v4i2.266
Rizaka, M. (2024). A Takhrīj Study of The Hadith Al-Thaqalayn in Sunan Al-Tirmidhī. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi, 5(4), 1723–1736. https://doi.org/10.59141/jist.v5i4.1030
Siregar, I., & Harahap, A. P. (2024). The Relevance of Hadith and Reason in Demonstrating The Status of Hadith. Al-Bukhari : Jurnal Ilmu Hadis, 7(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.32505/al-bukhari.v7i1.8237
Zahw, M. A. (1958). al-Ḥadīṡ wa al-Muḥaddiṡūn. Mesir: Dār al-Fikr.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Surya, Arya Handika Pransetia, Selfi Anna Harahap & Ulya Uzmanarati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
